Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Evaluating Dryocosmus Kuriphilus-induced Damage on Castanea Sativa
Published on: August 30, 2018
Measuring disaster recovery: bouncing back or reaching the counterfactual state?
Shaoming Cheng1, Emel Ganapati1, Sukumar Ganapati1
1Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Florida International University, United States.
Measuring disaster recovery is vital for policy and aid. This study found that while areas affected by Hurricane Katrina did not fully return to pre-disaster housing conditions, they did achieve a counterfactual recovery, suggesting rural areas may be less vulnerable than previously thought.
Area of Science:
- Disaster recovery research
- Public policy and administration
- Urban and rural studies
Background:
- Measuring locale recovery post-disaster is critical for public policy, disaster aid allocation, and program evaluation.
- Two primary recovery measurement approaches exist: returning to pre-disaster conditions and achieving a counterfactual state (what would have been without the disaster).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of 'bouncing back' versus 'counterfactual' recovery measurements.
- To assess housing recovery indicators (new units, valuations) in Hurricane Katrina-affected counties using both approaches.
- To examine potential differences in recovery between rural and urban counties.
Main Methods:
- Quasi-experimental design was employed to estimate the counterfactual state.
- Two housing recovery indicators were analyzed: total new housing units and their valuations.
- Data was collected from Hurricane Katrina-affected counties, differentiating between rural and urban areas.
Main Results:
- Counties analyzed did not fully return to their pre-disaster housing conditions.
- However, these counties demonstrated recovery when measured against the counterfactual state.
- Findings suggest rural counties might be less vulnerable in disaster recovery than commonly assumed in existing literature.
Conclusions:
- The choice of recovery measurement significantly impacts assessment outcomes.
- Counterfactual recovery is a more attainable metric than a complete return to pre-disaster conditions for housing.
- Disaster recovery strategies may need re-evaluation, particularly concerning the assumed vulnerability of rural areas.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Counterfactual Thinking
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Distribution Reliability and Automation
Design Example: Measuring Distance Between Two Points with Obstructions
Assumptions of Survival Analysis

