Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: August 7, 2017
Structural intervention distance for evaluating causal graphs
1Seminar for Statistics, Department of Mathematics, ETH Zürich 8092, Switzerland peters@stat.math.ethz.ch.
Abstract:
Causal inference relies on the structure of a graph, often a directed acyclic graph (DAG). Different graphs may result in different causal inference statements and different intervention distributions. To quantify such differences, we propose a (pre-)metric between DAGs, the structural intervention distance (SID). The SID is based on a graphical criterion only and quantifies the closeness between two DAGs in terms of their corresponding causal inference statements. It is therefore well suited for evaluating graphs that are used for computing interventions. Instead of DAGs, it is also possible to compare CPDAGs, completed partially DAGs that represent Markov equivalence classes. The SID differs significantly from the widely used structural Hamming distance and therefore constitutes a valuable additional measure. We discuss properties of this distance and provide a (reasonably) efficient implementation with software code available on the first author's home page.
More Related Videos
05:15The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
Published on: February 19, 2018
06:55Kinematic History of a Salient-recess Junction Explored through a Combined Approach of Field Data and Analog Sandbox Modeling
Published on: August 5, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Measuring Distance Between Two Points with Obstructions
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Graphical Representation of Inequalities
Graphs of Equations in Two Variables
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
Causality in Epidemiology