Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

09:45
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
Published on: January 23, 2017
8.7K
Trial-by-trial adjustments in control triggered by incidentally encoded semantic cues
Chris Blais1, Michael B Harris, Michael H Sinanian
1a Department of Psychology , Arizona State University , Tempe , AZ, USA.
Summary
Cognitive control adapts to context. Both low-level visual cues and high-level semantic categories influence this cognitive control, impacting task performance and response strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive psychology
- Neuroscience
- Human behavior
Background:
- Cognitive control enables adaptation to changing environmental demands.
- Contextual cues, including perceptual and goal-driven factors, modulate cognitive control.
- Previous research highlights low-level perceptual cues influencing cognitive control.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether high-level semantic categories can also facilitate contextual control.
- To determine if stimulus features beyond low-level perception engage cognitive control mechanisms.
- To assess the impact of semantic category properties on cognitive control.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a word-word interference task.
- Manipulated the semantic category of stimuli presented.
- Varied the proportion of incongruent stimuli within specific semantic categories (75% vs. 25%).
Main Results:
- Participants showed a larger Flanker effect for semantic categories with a higher proportion of incongruent items (75%).
- This indicates that semantic category information influences context-specific cognitive control.
- Both low-level perceptual features and high-level semantic features engage bottom-up cognitive control.
Conclusions:
- Cognitive control is sensitive to both low-level perceptual and high-level semantic contextual cues.
- High-level stimulus features, such as semantic category, can guide cognitive control.
- Findings have implications for refining current models of cognitive control mechanisms.
Related Concept Videos
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.9K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.9K
Hindsight Biases
4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
4.5K
Fundamental Attribution Error
14.1K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
14.1K
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
1.0K
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
1.0K

