Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Translesion DNA Polymerases02:10

Translesion DNA Polymerases

11.9K
Translesion (TLS) polymerases rescue stalled DNA polymerases at sites of damaged bases by replacing the replicative polymerase and installing a nucleotide across the damaged site. Doing so, TLS allows additional time for the cell to repair the damage before resuming regular DNA replication.
TLS polymerases are found in all three domains of life - archaea, bacteria, and eukaryotes. Of the different classes of TLS polymerases, members of the Y family are fitted with specialized structures that...
11.9K
Restarting Stalled Replication Forks02:37

Restarting Stalled Replication Forks

6.6K
DNA replication is initiated at sites containing predefined DNA sequences known as origins of replication. DNA is unwound at these sites by the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) helicase and other factors such as Cdc45 and the associated GINS complex.The unwound single strands are protected by replication protein A (RPA) until DNA polymerase starts synthesizing DNA at the 5’ end of the strand in the same direction as the replication fork. To prevent the replication fork from falling apart,...
6.6K
Homologous Recombination02:31

Homologous Recombination

66.0K
The basic reaction of homologous recombination (HR) involves two chromatids that contain DNA sequences sharing a significant stretch of identity. One of these sequences uses a strand from another as a template to synthesize DNA in an enzyme-catalyzed reaction. The final product is a novel amalgamation of the two substrates. To ensure an accurate recombination of sequences, HR is restricted to the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. At these stages, the DNA has been replicated already and the...
66.0K
The DNA Replication Fork01:02

The DNA Replication Fork

43.6K
An organism’s genome needs to be duplicated in an efficient and error-free manner for its growth and survival. The replication fork is a Y-shaped active region where two strands of DNA are separated and replicated continuously. The coupling of DNA unzipping and complementary strand synthesis is a characteristic feature of a replication fork.   Organisms with small circular DNA, such as E. coli, often have a single origin of replication; therefore, they have only two replication...
43.6K
The DNA Replication Fork01:02

The DNA Replication Fork

21.9K
21.9K
Replication in Prokaryotes02:35

Replication in Prokaryotes

104.6K
Overview
104.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Polarization in increasingly connected societies.

Physical review. E·2026
Same author

Heterophobic interactions hinder consensus formation in sparse random networks.

Physical review. E·2026
Same author

Same-day Discharge Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

European cardiology·2025
Same author

Cell cycle regulation has shaped replication origins in budding yeast.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2025
Same author

Effects of clustering heterogeneity on the spectral density of sparse networks.

Physical review. E·2024
Same author

Mei5-Sae3 stabilizes Dmc1 nucleating clusters for efficient Dmc1 assembly on RPA-coated single-stranded DNA.

Nucleic acids research·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Visualization of UV-induced Replication Intermediates in E. coli using Two-dimensional Agarose-gel Analysis
10:36

Visualization of UV-induced Replication Intermediates in E. coli using Two-dimensional Agarose-gel Analysis

Published on: December 21, 2010

11.2K

Recombinase and translesion DNA polymerase decrease the speed of replication fork progression during the DNA damage

Kang Wei Tan1, Tuan Minh Pham1, Asako Furukohri1

  • 1Division of Systems Biology, Graduate School of Biological Sciences, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan.

Nucleic Acids Research
|January 29, 2015
PubMed
Summary

The bacterial SOS response, a DNA damage safeguard, slows replication fork speed by 30-50%. Upregulated dinB and recA genes independently cause this slowdown, maintaining genome integrity.

More Related Videos

Inducing a Site Specific Replication Blockage in E. coli Using a Fluorescent Repressor Operator System
11:19

Inducing a Site Specific Replication Blockage in E. coli Using a Fluorescent Repressor Operator System

Published on: August 21, 2016

9.7K
Direct Restart of a Replication Fork Stalled by a Head-On RNA Polymerase
07:27

Direct Restart of a Replication Fork Stalled by a Head-On RNA Polymerase

Published on: April 29, 2010

14.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Visualization of UV-induced Replication Intermediates in E. coli using Two-dimensional Agarose-gel Analysis
10:36

Visualization of UV-induced Replication Intermediates in E. coli using Two-dimensional Agarose-gel Analysis

Published on: December 21, 2010

11.2K
Inducing a Site Specific Replication Blockage in E. coli Using a Fluorescent Repressor Operator System
11:19

Inducing a Site Specific Replication Blockage in E. coli Using a Fluorescent Repressor Operator System

Published on: August 21, 2016

9.7K
Direct Restart of a Replication Fork Stalled by a Head-On RNA Polymerase
07:27

Direct Restart of a Replication Fork Stalled by a Head-On RNA Polymerase

Published on: April 29, 2010

14.1K

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • The SOS response is a crucial bacterial DNA damage response pathway safeguarding genome integrity.
  • While key concepts of SOS response are established, its impact on DNA replication fork dynamics is unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how the SOS response influences the dynamics of DNA replication fork movement in Escherichia coli.
  • To identify the specific genes and proteins responsible for any observed changes in replication fork speed.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing Escherichia coli as a model organism.
  • Quantifying replication fork speed and overall DNA synthesis rates under induced and uninduced SOS conditions.
  • Analyzing the roles of dinB (DNA polymerase IV) and recA genes in regulating fork progression.

Main Results:

  • Inducing the SOS response decreased mean replication fork speed by 30-50% and overall DNA synthesis by 20-30%.
  • Both dinB and recA genes were independently responsible for the SOS-dependent replication fork slowdown.
  • Ectopic expression of dinB or recA in non-induced cells mimicked the slowdown, confirming their roles.

Conclusions:

  • The SOS response significantly restrains replication fork progression in bacteria.
  • Increased expression of dinB and recA plays a novel role in slowing unperturbed replication forks during the SOS response.
  • This mechanism contributes to maintaining genome integrity under DNA stress conditions.