Fly versus man: evolutionary impairment of nucleolar targeting affects the degradome of Drosophila's Taspase1

Désirée Wünsch1, Angelina Hahlbrock2, Christina Heiselmayer2

  • 1*Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Ear, Nose and Throat Department, University Medical Center of Mainz, Mainz, Germany; Institute for Molecular Biology, Centre for Medical Biotechnology, Mainz Scientific Screening Center UG & Co. KG, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany; Cell and Matrix Biology, Institute for Zoology, and Institute for Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany; II. Medizinische Klinik, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; and Department of Toxicology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany wuensch@uni-mainz.de rstauber@uni-mainz.de.

Insights

Drosophila Taspase1 (dTaspase1) differs from human Taspase1 in substrate specificity and localization due to a lack of the NoLS domain. This study reveals how transport and localization regulate protease function during evolution.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Human Taspase1 is crucial for development and cancer, processing key regulators like mixed-lineage leukemia protein.
  • Drosophila Taspase1 (dTaspase1) cleaves trithorax, indicating functional coevolution with its human ortholog.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate novel mechanisms regulating protease function by analyzing dTaspase1 and comparing it to its human counterpart.
  • To understand the role of localization in protease substrate specificity and evolutionary divergence.

Main Methods:

  • Functional analysis of dTaspase1, including alanine scanning mutagenesis.
  • Cell-based assays to determine substrate cleavage motifs and localization.
  • Comparative analysis of dTaspase1 and human Taspase1, including genetic modification to introduce the NoLS domain.

Main Results:

  • dTaspase1 possesses a distinct cleavage motif (Q(3)[F/I/L/M](2)D(1)↓G(1')X(2')X(3')) compared to human Taspase1 (Q(3)[F,I,L,V](2)D(1)↓G(1')x(2')D(3')D(4')), predicting a broader substrate range in Drosophila.
  • dTaspase1 lacks nuclear/nucleolar localization due to the absence of the conserved NoLS domain, impacting its interaction with nuclear proteins and cleavage of nuclear substrates like upstream stimulatory factor 2.
  • Genetic introduction of the NoLS domain into dTaspase1 restored nucleolar localization, nucleophosmin1 interaction, and efficient cleavage of nuclear substrates.

Conclusions:

  • Protease function can diverge evolutionarily through transport and localization mechanisms, as demonstrated by the differences between dTaspase1 and human Taspase1.
  • The NoLS domain plays a critical role in Taspase1 localization and substrate specificity, highlighting a mechanism for functional divergence between vertebrates and invertebrates.