Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Quantitative Assessment Protocol for Facial Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes with Stereophotogrammetry
Published on: December 9, 2025
Changes in cephalometric variables after orthognathic surgery and their relationship to patients' quality of life and
Tahereh Baherimoghaddam1, Morteza Oshagh2, Navid Naseri3
1Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj Iran.
Objectives:
This study was designed to assess the relationship between postsurgical cephalometric changes and quality of life and satisfaction after orthognathic surgery.
Material And Methods:
Sample size consisted of 30 patients with class III and 25 patients with class II malocclusion treated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and Le Fort I osteotomy. Profile convexity, lower facial height proportion, lip position and length, nose, and chin position were measured on pre and post-treatment cephalograms. To assess the patients' satisfaction and quality of life (QoL) after surgery, the questionnaire of the Rustemeyer's study and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) questionnaire were used, respectively. The paired-sample t-test, Spearman correlation analysis and Pearson correlation analysis was used in SPSS statistical software.
Results:
In class III malocclusion patients, decrease in facial angle, convexity angle, mentolabial angle, and increase in upper lip protrusion had the most positive impact on QoL. Decrease in facial angle and increase in upper lip protrusion were correlated positively with satisfaction questionnaires. In class II malocclusion patients, increase in convexity angle, facial angle and mentolabial angle had the most positive impact on satisfaction and QoL.
Conclusions:
Consideration both subjective and objective parameters affecting on the patients' satisfaction and their quality of life is essential.
More Related Videos
10:42A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
08:03Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025