Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
Solvent effects in time-dependent self-consistent field methods. I. Optical response calculations.
J A Bjorgaard1, V Kuzmenko2, K A Velizhanin3
1Center for Nonlinear Studies, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA.
We explored three excited state solvent models within time-dependent self-consistent field methods. Differences in these models, including linear response and state specific approaches, impact calculated excitation energies and reflect the excitation character.
Area of Science:
- Computational chemistry
- Theoretical chemistry
- Quantum chemistry
Background:
- Solvent effects significantly influence molecular properties and reaction pathways.
- Accurate modeling of excited states requires considering solvent interactions.
- Different theoretical approaches exist for incorporating solvent effects in quantum chemical calculations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To implement and compare three distinct excited state solvent models.
- To analyze the relationship between these models using a unified formalism.
- To investigate the impact of these models on excitation energies for molecules with varying charge transfer characteristics.
Main Methods:
- Implementation of linear response, state specific, and vertical excitation solvent models.
- Application of time-dependent self-consistent field (TD-SCF) methods.
- Calculations performed using a formalism equivalent to COSMO/CIS/AM1.
- Qualitative explanation of solvent effects using a dipole approximation.
Main Results:
- The study reveals the interrelationships between the three implemented solvent models.
- Significant differences in calculated excitation energies were observed across the models.
- The magnitude of solvent effects correlates with the excited state charge transfer character of the molecules.
- The character of the calculated excitations directly reflects the fundamental differences between the solvent models.
Conclusions:
- The choice of excited state solvent model critically affects computed excitation energies.
- The observed differences are well-explained by a dipole approximation, highlighting the importance of charge distribution.
- The study provides a consistent framework for understanding and applying excited state solvent models in computational chemistry.
More Related Videos
08:12Author Spotlight: Exploring Light-Driven Chemical Reactions and Energy-Harnessing Devices in Photochemical Research
Published on: February 16, 2024
08:54Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
Published on: January 25, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Chemical Shift: Internal References and Solvent Effects
The internal reference compound generally used in NMR spectroscopy is tetramethylsilane (TMS). TMS is preferred because it is chemically inert, soluble in NMR solvents, and easily removable. Also, the highly shielded methyl protons in TMS yield an intense...
Solvating Effects
Debye–Huckel–Onsager Conductance Equation
IR Spectroscopy: Hooke's Law Approximation of Molecular Vibration
According to Hooke's law, the vibrational frequency is directly proportional to...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...