Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

07:26
Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae
Published on: April 23, 2016
10.0K
Random walks on semantic networks can resemble optimal foraging
Joshua T Abbott1, Joseph L Austerweil2, Thomas L Griffiths1
1Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.
Psychological Review
|February 3, 2015
Summary
Memory retrieval clusters related items, similar to foraging. Our study shows random walks on semantic networks mimic this pattern, suggesting memory search may be less strategic than previously thought.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Computational Neuroscience
- Semantic Network Analysis
Background:
- Memory retrieval often yields clusters of semantically related items.
- Previous work proposed this reflects optimal foraging strategies in information retrieval.
- This optimal foraging model suggests strategic switching from depleted information clusters.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate alternative explanations for clustered memory retrieval.
- To explore whether random walk processes on semantic networks can replicate observed retrieval patterns.
- To challenge the necessity of strategic search in explaining memory recall phenomena.
Main Methods:
- Constructed a semantic network from human word-association data.
- Simulated random walk processes on this semantic network.
- Analyzed the emergent retrieval patterns from the random walks.
- Compared simulation results with empirical findings on clustered memory recall.
Main Results:
- Random walks on the semantic network produced retrieval patterns similar to optimal foraging.
- Clustered retrieval emerged when semantically related items were spatially proximate in the network.
- The findings suggest undirected search processes can account for the observed phenomena.
Conclusions:
- Memory search may not require strategic decisions akin to optimal foraging.
- Random walk models offer a viable alternative explanation for clustered memory retrieval.
- Different cognitive processes can yield similar behavioral outcomes depending on the underlying representational structure.
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
14.3K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
14.3K
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I
1.1K
The Wald-Wolfowitz test, also known as the runs test, is a nonparametric statistical test used to assess the randomness of a sequence of two different types of elements (e.g., positive/negative values, successes/failures). It examines whether the order of the elements in a sequence is random or if there is a pattern or trend present. This nonparametric test applies to any ordered data despite the population and sample data distribution, even if a higher sample size is available.
The test works...
The test works...
1.1K
Randomized Experiments
9.4K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.4K
Instinctive Drift
1.4K
Instinctive drift refers to the tendency of animals to revert to their innate behaviors despite repeated reinforcement. Breland and Breland demonstrated this concept in an experiment with a raccoon. The raccoon was trained to pick up two coins and place them in a container in exchange for food. Initially, the raccoon learned to associate the coins with food, making them a conditioned stimulus or a substitute for food. However, over time, the raccoon became less willing to put the coins into the...
1.4K

