Oxygen saturation target range for extremely preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Preoxygenation Techniques for Tracheal Intubation in Critically Ill Adults Utilizing Oxygen Mask and Noninvasive Ventilation
Published on: December 5, 2025
Veena Manja1, Satyan Lakshminrusimha2, Deborah J Cook3
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Buffalo, New York2Department of Internal Medicine, University at Buffalo, the State University of New York, Buffalo3Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McM.
Insights
Liberal oxygen targets for extremely preterm infants may reduce early mortality but increase necrotizing enterocolitis. Further research is needed to determine optimal oxygen saturation (SpO2) levels for this vulnerable population.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Pediatric Critical Care
- Respiratory Physiology
Background:
- Optimal oxygen saturation (SpO2) targets for extremely preterm infants remain undefined.
- Current clinical practices vary, lacking definitive evidence for specific SpO2 ranges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review existing evidence on the impact of restricted versus liberal oxygen exposure on morbidity and mortality in extremely preterm infants.
- To synthesize findings from randomized trials to inform clinical guidelines.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive search of multiple databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, CENTRAL, CINAHL) and conference abstracts was conducted.
- Included published randomized trials comparing restricted (SpO2 85%-89%) with liberal (SpO2 91%-95%) oxygen exposure in infants born before 28 weeks' gestation.
- Meta-analyses used random-effects models, with study quality assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and evidence certainty by GRADEpro.
Main Results:
- Five trials were synthesized, with a composite outcome of death/disability at 18-24 months. No significant difference was found in death/disability before 24 months (RR 1.02).
- Mortality before hospital discharge was higher in the restricted oxygen group (RR 1.18), but overall mortality before 24 months was not significantly different (RR 1.13).
- Necrotizing enterocolitis rates were higher with restricted oxygen (RR 1.24), while bronchopulmonary dysplasia, neurodevelopmental outcomes, hearing loss, and retinopathy of prematurity showed no significant differences between groups. Evidence quality was moderate to low.
Conclusions:
- Liberal oxygen targets were associated with lower in-hospital mortality but with low-certainty evidence. The incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis was reduced in the liberal oxygen group.
- No significant differences were observed in death or disability at 24 months, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, neurodevelopmental outcomes, or hearing loss.
- The findings highlight a trade-off between early mortality and other morbidities, underscoring the uncertainty surrounding optimal oxygen management for extremely preterm infants.
Importance:
The optimal oxygen saturation (SpO2) target for extremely preterm infants is unknown.
Objective:
To systematically review evidence evaluating the effect of restricted vs liberal oxygen exposure on morbidity and mortality in extremely preterm infants.
Data Sources:
MEDLINE, PubMed, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases from their inception to March 31, 2014, and abstracts submitted to Pediatric Academic Societies from 2000 to 2014.
Study Selection:
All published randomized trials evaluating the effect of restricted (SpO2, 85%-89%) vs liberal (SpO2, 91%-95%) oxygen exposure in preterm infants (<28 weeks' gestation at birth).
Data Extraction And Synthesis:
All meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.2. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess study quality. The summary of the findings and the level of confidence in the estimate of effect were assessed using GRADEpro. Treatment effect was analyzed using a random-effects model.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Death before hospital discharge, death or severe disability before 24 months, death before 24 months, neurodevelopmental outcomes, hearing loss, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, and severe retinopathy of prematurity.
Results:
Five trials were included in the final synthesis. These studies had a similar design with a prespecified composite outcome of death/disability at 18 to 24 months corrected for prematurity; however, this outcome has not been reported for 2 of the 5 trials. There was no difference in the outcome of death/disability before 24 months (risk ratio [RR], 1.02 [95% CI, 0.92-1.14]). Mortality before 24 months was not different (RR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.97-1.33]); however, a significant increase in mortality before hospital discharge was found in the restricted oxygen group (RR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.03-1.36]). The rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, neurodevelopmental outcomes, hearing loss, and retinopathy of prematurity were similar between the 2 groups. Necrotizing enterocolitis occurred more frequently in infants on restricted oxygen (RR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.05-1.47]). Using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria, we found that the quality of evidence for these outcomes was moderate to low.
Conclusions And Relevance:
Although infants cared for with a liberal oxygen target had significantly lower mortality before hospital discharge than infants cared for with a restricted oxygen target, the quality of evidence for this estimate of effect is low. Necrotizing enterocolitis occurred less frequently in the liberal oxygen group. We found no significant differences in death or disability at 24 months, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, neurodevelopmental outcomes, or hearing loss at 24 months.
More Related Videos
07:27How to Administer Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Critically ill Neonates, Infants, and Children
Published on: August 19, 2020
14:28Non-Invasive Monitoring of Microvascular Oxygenation and Reactive Hyperemia using Hybrid, Near-Infrared Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for Critical Care
Published on: May 10, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Special considerations while measuring oxygen saturation
Ensuring accuracy in vital sign recordings while prioritizing patient comfort and minimizing anxiety is...
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.
Pulse Oximetry
Purpose
Average SpO2 values are greater than 95%. If the readings fall below 90%, it indicates that...
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Oxygen Therapy for Respiratory Failure
Oxygen therapy is vital in increasing and maintaining blood oxygen levels in PAH patients. As a result, it aids in reducing fatigue,...
Assessment of Diffusion and Perfusion
The Role of Diffusion in Respiration
Diffusion is the process by which molecules move from an area of higher concentration to an area of lower concentration. In the respiratory system, this...