Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Thermal Ablation for the Treatment of Abdominal Tumors
Published on: March 7, 2011
Morbidity and mortality after thermal venous ablations
Rafael D Malgor1, Antonios P Gasparis, Nicos Labropoulos
1Division of Vascular Surgery, The University of Oklahoma, Tulsa, OK, USA - rafael-malgor@ouhsc.edu.
Endovenous ablation (EVA) for saphenous vein reflux has risks including pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, despite a low overall complication rate. Awareness of potential complications and device failures is crucial for patient safety.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Medical Device Safety
- Health Informatics
Background:
- Saphenous vein reflux treatment has advanced with thermal ablation techniques.
- Endovenous ablation (EVA) is widely accepted but its risks are often underestimated.
- This study analyzes complications associated with EVA procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze complications of endovenous ablation (EVA) using national database data.
- To identify patient-related injuries and device failures associated with EVLT and RFA.
- To assess the incidence and trends of adverse events following EVA.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 349 adverse events from the MAUDE database (2000-2012).
- Included endovenous laser ablation (EVLT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) procedures.
- Outcomes assessed: pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), death, and device failures.
Main Results:
- 58% of events were patient injuries, 42% were device failures.
- Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) had more reported complications than endovenous laser ablation (EVLT).
- Adverse event rates were low: 1-2 per 10,000 procedures for EVLT/RFA over 5 years.
Conclusions:
- EVA is effective but carries risks, including rare mortality from PE.
- Reported complications represent a fraction of actual events due to underreporting.
- A national registry is needed to accurately determine the magnitude of EVA complications.
More Related Videos
06:25Cooling or Warming the Esophagus to Reduce Esophageal Injury During Left Atrial Ablation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: March 15, 2020
04:58Reduced Procedure Time and Variability with Active Esophageal Cooling During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: August 25, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above...