Related Experiment Videos
"Synergistic selection": a Darwinian frame for the evolution of complexity
Peter A Corning1, Eörs Szathmáry2
1Institute for the Study of Complex Systems, 620 NE Vineyard Lane, B-303, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110, United States.
Journal of Theoretical Biology
|February 15, 2015
Summary
The synergism hypothesis offers a Darwinian economic theory for complexity evolution, proposing that cooperative phenomena and synergistic selection drive major evolutionary transitions. This approach highlights how interdependent units become favored through functional advantages.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Complexity theory
- Biophysics
Background:
- Non-Darwinian theories on complexity evolution date back to Lamarck and Spencer.
- Modern approaches are found in biophysics and complexity theory.
- A Darwinian alternative, the synergism hypothesis, proposes a causal role for synergy in complexity evolution.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present the synergism hypothesis as a Darwinian economic theory for complexity evolution.
- To explain the concept of synergistic selection.
- To provide historical context and model examples.
Main Methods:
- Historical analysis of complexity theories.
- Explication of the synergism hypothesis and synergistic selection.
- Description of two relevant evolutionary models.
Main Results:
- Synergistic effects and cooperative phenomena provide functional advantages.
- These advantages are favored in evolutionary dynamics, leading to complexity.
- Synergistic selection models demonstrate how wholes become interdependent units of selection.
Conclusions:
- The synergism hypothesis provides a Darwinian framework for understanding the evolution of complexity.
- Synergistic selection is a key mechanism driving major evolutionary transitions.
- Cooperative phenomena are crucial for achieving otherwise unattainable functional advantages.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Selection
46.7K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
46.7K
Limits to Natural Selection
36.2K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
36.2K
Evolutionary Psychology
1.3K
Evolutionary psychology explores the origins of human behavior and mental processes by framing them within the context of natural selection, a theory famously propounded by Charles Darwin. This field asserts that many behaviors common across human societies — ranging from instinctive fear reactions to complex social interactions — arose as evolutionary adaptations. These adaptations enhanced the survival and reproductive success of our ancestors, thereby becoming embedded in the...
1.3K
Genetics of Speciation
23.5K
Speciation is the evolutionary process resulting in the formation of new, distinct species—groups of reproductively isolated populations.
23.5K
The Evidence for Evolution
50.9K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
50.9K
Frequency-dependent Selection
24.5K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
24.5K