Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

11:25
Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery
Published on: October 11, 2010
16.4K
Processing Speed Measures as Clinical Markers for Children With Language Impairment
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR
|February 16, 2015
Summary
Processing speed tasks moderately predict language impairment (LI) in children. A linguistic task was best in 3rd grade, while a combination of linguistic and nonlinguistic tasks improved prediction in 8th grade.
Area of Science:
- Developmental psychology
- Linguistics
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Language impairment (LI) affects children's academic and social development.
- Processing speed is a cognitive function crucial for language acquisition and use.
- Understanding predictors of LI is essential for early identification and intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the predictive utility of linguistic and nonlinguistic processing speed tasks for identifying language impairment (LI) in children.
- To examine these predictive relationships across two developmental time points: 3rd and 8th grades.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed reaction time data from 131 children (42 with LI, 89 typically developing [TD]) in 3rd and 8th grades.
- Employed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses and likelihood ratios (LR) to assess diagnostic accuracy.
- Utilized binary logistic regression to evaluate the combined predictive power of different tasks.
Main Results:
- In 3rd grade, a linguistic task (grammaticality judgment) best distinguished between children with and without LI.
- In 8th grade, a combination of linguistic (rhyme judgment) and nonlinguistic (simple response time) tasks showed the strongest discrimination.
- Processing speed tasks demonstrated moderate predictive ability for LI status at both time points.
Conclusions:
- Processing speed tasks are moderately effective predictors of language impairment in children.
- Slow processing speed is more indicative of the presence than the absence of LI (higher LR+ than LR-).
- Nonlinguistic processing speed contributes to LI prediction later in development (8th grade), suggesting distinct developmental trajectories for linguistic and nonlinguistic processing.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Language Development
1.1K
Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
1.1K
Language and Cognition
1.0K
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
1.0K

