Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

06:13
Vertical T-maze Choice Assay for Arthropod Response to Odorants
Published on: February 14, 2013
15.5K
Round robin test for odour testing of migration waters.
Thomas Rapp1, Herbert Günther1
1Umweltbundesamt (Federal Environment Agency), Heinrich-Heine-Str. 12, 08645 Bad Elster, Germany.
Water Research
|February 18, 2015
Summary
A round robin test evaluated the EN 1420-1 standard for odor assessment of plastic pipes in contact with drinking water. Reference substances like Methyl tert-butyl ether (MtBE) and 1-butanol are suitable for panel qualification, improving test method reliability.
Area of Science:
- Sensory science
- Materials science
- Environmental science
Background:
- Standard EN 1420-1 assesses odor from organic materials in contact with drinking water.
- Round robin tests are crucial for validating analytical methods and ensuring inter-laboratory comparability.
- Assessing odor is vital for public health and consumer acceptance of water supply materials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of the EN 1420-1 standard through a collaborative inter-laboratory study.
- To assess the suitability of reference substances for qualifying sensory panels and individual assessors.
- To compare different testing options and identify improvements for odor analysis reproducibility.
Main Methods:
- 14 laboratories across 10 European countries participated in the round robin test.
- Plastic pipe segments underwent migration tests and odor analysis of migration water according to EN 1420-1.
- Reference substances (Methyl tert-butyl ether, 1-butanol, hexanal) were tested for panel qualification, and both unforced and forced choice methods were applied.
Main Results:
- Methyl tert-butyl ether (MtBE) and 1-butanol proved effective for panel qualification, unlike hexanal.
- Unforced choice testing showed advantages in panellist qualification and data analysis compared to forced choice.
- Odor threshold number (TON) results for the pipe material showed a range of ±1.5 dilutions, indicating potential for improvement.
Conclusions:
- Reference substances are valuable for training, auditing, and selecting sensory panellists to enhance odor test reliability.
- Incorporating individual panellist sensitivities more strongly can improve the reproducibility of odor assessments.
- The findings from this round robin test will inform the revision process of the EN 1420-1 standard.

