Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Effectiveness of regular versus glargine insulin in stable critical care patients receiving parenteral nutrition: a
Mohammad Bagher Oghazian1, Mohammad Reza Javadi, Mania Radfar
1Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Insights
Glargine insulin and regular insulin provide similar glycemic control in critical care patients receiving parenteral nutrition. Both regimens demonstrated comparable rates of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, indicating comparable safety and effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Critical care medicine
- Endocrinology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Parenteral nutrition (PN) is essential for critically ill patients.
- Maintaining optimal glycemic control is crucial for patient outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU).
- Different insulin regimens are used to manage blood glucose levels during PN.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness and safety of glargine insulin versus regular insulin for glycemic control in stable critical care patients receiving PN.
- To evaluate blood glucose levels, hyperglycemia, and hypoglycemia rates between the two insulin regimens.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, randomized open-label clinical trial involving stable postoperative critical care patients.
- Patients received PN with regular insulin, followed by randomization to either continued regular insulin or glargine insulin for 3 days.
- Blood glucose levels were monitored every 6 hours.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in mean daily dextrose or insulin doses between the groups.
- Similar percentages of blood glucose values within the target range (110-180 mg/dl), hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dl), and hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dl).
- Mean daily blood glucose levels were not significantly different between the regular insulin and glargine insulin groups.
Conclusions:
- Glargine insulin, when added to PN, offers similar glycemic control compared to regular insulin in stable critical care patients.
- The rates of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia were comparable between the two insulin regimens.
- These findings suggest glargine insulin is a viable alternative for glycemic management in this patient population.
Study Objective:
To compare the effectiveness and safety of two glycemic control regimens in stable critical care patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN).
Design:
Prospective, randomized open-label clinical trial.
Methods:
Eligible postoperative critical care patients in the ICU began PN on the first to the seventh day of ICU admission. The PN admixture included regular insulin, in doses sufficient to maintain 3 or more goal blood glucose (BG) levels between 110 and 180 mg/dl. After 3 to 5 days of PN containing regular insulin, patients were randomized to 3 more days of regular insulin at the same dose or 80% of their total daily regular insulin dose provided in PN solution as glargine insulin. Capillary BG monitoring was performed every 6 hours.
Results:
Twenty one patients were randomized to each treatment group. Median APACHE II scores were not significantly different between the two groups within the first 24-hour of ICU admission. There were no significant differences between the two groups at day 3 for mean daily dextrose (306.9 ± 46.2 vs. 305.2 ± 52.2 g; p=0.913) or insulin (18.3 ± 8.8 vs. 19.5 ± 10.0 units; p=0.696) doses. The percentage of BG values in the goal (110-180 mg/dl), hyperglycemic (> 180 mg/dl), and hypoglycemic (< 70 mg/dl) BG levels were similar between the two groups (69.0% vs. 66.7%, p=0.567; 11.9% vs. 11.1%, p=0.780; 0% vs. 1.6%, p=0.124, respectively). Mean daily BG levels were not significantly different between the two groups on each of the 3 study days (day 1: 140 ± 20 vs. 131 ± 25 mg/dl, p=0.194; day 2: 136 ± 20 vs. 140 ± 18 mg/dl, p=0.498; day 3: 142 ± 15 vs. 140 ± 19 mg/dl; p=0.741).
Conclusion:
These data suggest that, compared with regular insulin added to PN, glargine insulin results in similar glycemic control and rates of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia in stable critical care patients.
Related Concept Videos
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Insulin Formulations: Types and Delivery
Short-acting insulins are divided into...
Hypoglycemia and Glucagon
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides

