Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Preventive versus culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with
Yeo-Jeong Song1, Ho-Cheol Shin, Joo-Ii Yang
1Department of Cardiology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Insights
For ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease, preventive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces repeat revascularization but does not improve mortality or myocardial infarction (MI) rates. This strategy is effective in lowering repeat procedures compared to culprit-only PCI.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Complete revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) has shown clinical benefits.
- The role of preventive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with multivessel CAD remains controversial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical outcomes of preventive PCI versus culprit-only PCI in STEMI patients with multivessel CAD.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials and observational studies published up to September 2014.
- Primary endpoint: all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints: myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
Main Results:
- Preventive PCI significantly reduced repeat revascularization (OR: 0.71) but showed no significant difference in all-cause mortality (OR: 0.99) or MI (OR: 1.08) compared to culprit-only PCI.
- No significant difference in MACE was observed (OR: 0.80).
- Stratified analysis indicated a survival benefit for culprit-only PCI over multivessel PCI during the index procedure and lower mortality with staged PCI.
Conclusions:
- Preventive PCI in STEMI patients with multivessel disease effectively reduces repeat revascularization.
- This strategy does not offer significant benefits in terms of mortality or MI compared to culprit-only revascularization.
Background:
Although previous studies have suggested clinical benefits of complete revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, it is still controversial whether preventive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) leads to better clinical outcomes in the clinical setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Methods:
Relevant studies through September 2014 were searched and identified in the electronic databases.Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at the longest follow-up. Secondary endpoints included myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
Results:
From 836 initial citations, 7 randomized trials, and 23 observational studies with 44,256 patients (8,087 preventive and 36,169 culprit-only) were included in this study. Preventive PCI was associated with a significant reduction in repeat revascularization (odds ratios [OR]: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.51–0.99) with no differences in all-cause mortality (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.76–1.29) or MI (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.62–1.87) as compared with culprit-only PCI.Comparison of preventive PCI to the culprit-only PCI group revealed OR for MACE of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.57–1.12).Stratified analysis according to revascularization strategy demonstrated a significant survival benefit of culprit-only PCI over multivessel PCI during the index procedure and a significantly lower incidence of all-cause mortality with staged PCI as compared with culprit-only or multivessel PCI during the index procedure.
Conclusions:
Preventive PCI strategy appears to be effective in reducing the risk of repeat revascularization without significant benefits for mortality or MI when compared with culprit-only revascularization in STEMI patients with multivessel disease.
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
08:12Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care