Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Do guidelines offer implementation advice to target users? A systematic review of guideline applicability
Anna R Gagliardi1, Melissa C Brouwers2
1University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Clinical practice guidelines published after 2008 still lack implementation support, hindering their use. Research is needed to develop effective tools for healthcare providers and patients to improve guideline applicability.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
Background:
- Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are crucial for healthcare delivery.
- Guidelines published before 2008, assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument, showed poor applicability due to a lack of implementation support.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the applicability of CPGs published from 2008 onwards.
- To identify factors associated with the applicability of these guidelines.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review was conducted on studies using the AGREE instrument to assess CPGs published from 2008 to July 2014.
- MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched, and reference lists were reviewed.
- Multilevel regression analysis identified factors associated with applicability.
Main Results:
- Twenty studies, evaluating 137 guidelines, were included.
- The mean applicability score was 43.6%, which did not significantly improve compared to earlier guidelines.
- Applicability scored lower than other AGREE domains.
- Guideline applicability was associated with country (UK) and developer type (disease-specific foundation, non-profit healthcare system) when assessed with AGREE II.
Conclusions:
- Despite recognized needs, CPGs continue to lack essential implementation tools.
- Further research is required to determine the necessary types of implementation tools for healthcare providers and consumers.
- Developing high-quality implementation tools is essential for improving healthcare delivery and outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
