Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Prone Lateral Minimally Invasive Retropleural Corpectomy Using a Rotatable Radiolucent Jackson Table
Published on: July 3, 2025
Supine or prone position for mini-PNL procedure: does it matter
Zafer Tokatlı1, Mehmet Ilker Gokce, Evren Süer
1Department of Urology, Doruk Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract:
In this study it is aimed to compare the success and complication rates of mini-PNL procedure in supine and prone positions. In this retrospective study data of 180 patients treated with MPNL either in supine (n = 54) or prone (n = 126) positions between May 2009 and August 2014 was investigated. Success was defined as no visible stones >2 mm. Perioperative complications were classified using the modified Clavien system. Groups were compared with Chi square test or Student t test and for statistical significance p value of 0.05 was accepted. Mean age of the population was 42.5 ± 8.2 years and mean stone size was 23.9 ± 4.1 mm. The two groups were similar with regard to demographic characteristics and stone related characteristics except the ASA status. Success rates of the supine and prone groups were 85.1 and 87.3%, respectively (p = 0.701). No statistically significant differences in terms of complications were observed. Mean operative time was the only parameter different between the two groups (55 vs 82 min, p = 0.001). Supine position for PNL seems to be promising and the complication and success rates are shown to be similar to the prone position with MPNL technique. The only significant benefit of this technique is shorter operative time.
Insights
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in supine versus prone positions shows similar success and complication rates. The supine approach offers a significantly shorter operative time, making it a promising alternative for kidney stone treatment.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Nephrolithiasis Management
Background:
- Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is a key procedure for kidney stone removal.
- Patient positioning (supine vs. prone) can influence PNL outcomes.
- Mini-PNL offers a less invasive approach to stone extraction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of mini-PNL in supine versus prone positions.
- To evaluate success rates and complication profiles of both positions.
- To identify potential advantages of one position over the other in mini-PNL.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 180 patients undergoing mini-PNL (May 2009 - Aug 2014).
- Patients were grouped by position: supine (n=54) or prone (n=126).
- Success defined as no residual stones >2 mm; complications graded by modified Clavien system.
Main Results:
- Similar success rates: 85.1% supine vs. 87.3% prone (p=0.701).
- No significant difference in complication rates between supine and prone groups.
- Mean operative time was significantly shorter in the supine group (55 min vs. 82 min, p=0.001).
Conclusions:
- Mini-PNL in the supine position demonstrates comparable success and complication rates to the prone position.
- The supine position offers a significant advantage with reduced operative time.
- Supine mini-PNL is a viable and potentially more efficient option for kidney stone treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Anatomical Positions
The body is upright, facing forward, and standing erect.
The feet are parallel and flat on the floor.
The arms are hanging by the...
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure

