Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Single cell phototransfection of mRNAs encoding SARS-CoV2 spike and nucleocapsid into human astrocytes results in RNA dependent translation interference.

Frontiers in drug delivery·2025
Same author

Confocal Absorbance-Activated Droplet Sorting (cAADS) for Enzyme Engineering.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2025
Same author

Run-and-tumble dynamics of active giant vesicles.

Soft matter·2025
Same author

Light-Responsive Mononucleotide Coacervates.

Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2025
Same author

Pheno-Morphological Screening and Acoustic Sorting of 3D Multicellular Aggregates Using Drop Millifluidics.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2025
Same author

Enhancement of bacterial rheotaxis in non-Newtonian fluids.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: Integrating Computational and Experimental Approaches in Precision Oncology
07:03

Author Spotlight: Integrating Computational and Experimental Approaches in Precision Oncology

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.7K

Monitoring reactive microencapsulation dynamics using microfluidics.

Ingmar Polenz1, Quentin Brosseau, Jean-Christophe Baret

  • 1Max-Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Am Fassberg 17, Göttingen, Germany. Ingmar.polenz@ds.mpg.de.

Soft Matter
|February 24, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study uses microfluidic devices to measure the speed of microcapsule shell formation. Researchers quantified how different chemicals and conditions affect encapsulation kinetics, offering insights for creating tailored microcapsules.

More Related Videos

High Throughput Single-cell and Multiple-cell Micro-encapsulation
16:19

High Throughput Single-cell and Multiple-cell Micro-encapsulation

Published on: June 15, 2012

19.3K
Microfluidic Chips Controlled with Elastomeric Microvalve Arrays
18:11

Microfluidic Chips Controlled with Elastomeric Microvalve Arrays

Published on: October 1, 2007

22.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: Integrating Computational and Experimental Approaches in Precision Oncology
07:03

Author Spotlight: Integrating Computational and Experimental Approaches in Precision Oncology

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.7K
High Throughput Single-cell and Multiple-cell Micro-encapsulation
16:19

High Throughput Single-cell and Multiple-cell Micro-encapsulation

Published on: June 15, 2012

19.3K
Microfluidic Chips Controlled with Elastomeric Microvalve Arrays
18:11

Microfluidic Chips Controlled with Elastomeric Microvalve Arrays

Published on: October 1, 2007

22.0K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Chemical Engineering
  • Physical Chemistry

Background:

  • Reactive encapsulation is crucial for creating microcapsules with specific properties.
  • Understanding the early-stage kinetics of shell formation is essential for controlling microcapsule characteristics.
  • Existing methods lack the precision to analyze rapid interfacial reactions at the millisecond timescale.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and utilize a microfluidic device for precise measurement of reactive encapsulation kinetics.
  • To investigate the influence of monomer composition and phase (oil-in-water vs. water-in-oil) on encapsulation speed.
  • To quantify the effect of surfactants on the kinetics of polyurea microcapsule formation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic devices with expansion-constriction chambers.
  • Measured droplet deformability to infer polymeric shell formation kinetics.
  • Analyzed reactions with millisecond time resolution for processes under 0.5 seconds.

Main Results:

  • Quantified early-stage encapsulation kinetics for polyurea microcapsules (PUMCs).
  • Demonstrated that the monomer in the continuous phase significantly impacts encapsulation kinetics.
  • Observed differing kinetics between oil-in-water (O/W) and water-in-oil (W/O) systems and quantified surfactant retarding effects.

Conclusions:

  • The microfluidic approach provides millisecond resolution for in situ analysis of reactive encapsulation.
  • Monomer reactivity and phase partitioning critically influence PUMC formation kinetics.
  • Findings offer guidelines for designing microcapsules with controlled interfacial properties.