Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

08:12
Micro-dissection of Enamel Organ from Mandibular Incisor of Rats Exposed to Environmental Toxicants
Published on: March 29, 2018
10.9K
Light-activated bleaching: effects on surface mineral change on enamel
Adriana Fernandes da Silva1, Flévio Fernando Demarco2, Carine Tais Welter Meereis3
1Associate Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil,
The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
|February 25, 2015
Summary
This study found that 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP) bleaching gel, activated by Quartz Tungsten-Halogen (QTH) or LED light curing units (LCUs), does not harm dental enamel surface or mineral content.
Area of Science:
- Dental materials science
- Biomaterials
- Conservative dentistry
Background:
- Dental bleaching with hydrogen peroxide (HP) is a common cosmetic procedure.
- The effect of light curing units (LCUs) on enamel integrity during bleaching requires further investigation.
- Understanding potential surface changes is crucial for safe and effective dental treatments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the in vitro effect of 35% HP on bovine enamel surface microhardness and topography.
- To compare the impact of Quartz Tungsten-Halogen (QTH) and Light Emitting Diode (LED) LCUs when activating 35% HP.
- To assess the safety of 35% HP bleaching with different LCUs on enamel mineral content.
Main Methods:
- Bovine enamel blocks were subjected to microhardness testing.
- Groups were treated with 35% HP, with or without QTH or LED activation.
- Microhardness was measured immediately, 7, and 14 days post-treatment; SEM was used for surface analysis.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in enamel microhardness were observed between the control and treated groups at any time point.
- Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed no significant surface alterations attributable to the bleaching treatments.
- The mineral content of the enamel remained unaffected by 35% HP, regardless of LCU activation.
Conclusions:
- 35% HP bleaching, whether activated by QTH or LED LCUs, does not adversely affect enamel surface topography.
- The mineral content of dental enamel is not compromised by 35% HP bleaching with QTH or LED activation.
- These findings suggest that 35% HP bleaching with QTH or LED LCUs is a safe procedure for dental enamel in vitro.

