Behavioral and molecular responses to electroconvulsive shock differ between genetic and environmental rat models of

Jie Luo1, Su Min1, Ke Wei1

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.

Psychiatry Research
|February 25, 2015
PubMed

Insights

Electroconvulsive shock (ECS) improved depression in rat models. Environmental stress models showed better memory and molecular responses to ECS compared to genetic models.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Depression treatment response varies due to underlying causes.
  • Advancements in understanding antidepressant mechanisms are needed.
  • Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective antidepressant treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate electroconvulsive shock (ECS) mechanisms and responses in distinct depression models.
  • Compare ECS efficacy in genetic (Wistar Kyoto rats) versus environmental (CUMS-exposed Wistar rats) depression models.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Wistar Kyoto (WKY) and chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) rat models.
  • Administered electroconvulsive shock (ECS) or sham ECS.
  • Assessed behavior via sucrose preference, open field, and Morris water maze tests.
  • Measured hippocampal neuron counts (Nissl stain) and protein levels (BDNF, CREB, p-CREB via ELISA/Western blot).

Main Results:

  • ECS improved depressive behavior and hippocampal p-CREB in both rat models.
  • ECS enhanced memory in CUMS rats but impaired it in WKY rats.
  • Hippocampal BDNF and CREB levels increased only in CUMS rats following ECS.
  • No significant changes in hippocampal neuron numbers were observed.

Conclusions:

  • ECS up-regulates hippocampal BDNF, CREB, and phosphorylation in depressed rats.
  • Environmental depression models demonstrate a superior response to ECS compared to genetic models.
  • Differential responses highlight the influence of depression etiology on treatment efficacy.