Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

14:49
Conducting Respiratory Oscillometry in an Outpatient Setting
Published on: April 8, 2022
9.0K
Tiotropium HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) in COPD: a pooled safety analysis
David Mg Halpin1, Ronald Dahl2, Christoph Hallmann3
1Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, Devon, England, UK.
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
|February 25, 2015
Summary
Tiotropium, used for COPD, showed significantly lower risks of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) compared to placebo. Both HandiHaler and Respimat inhalers demonstrated a similar safety profile for tiotropium delivery.
Area of Science:
- Pulmonary Medicine
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Tiotropium is a key treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
- It is available via two inhaler devices: HandiHaler (18 μg) and Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler (5 μg).
- Previous studies indicated similar safety profiles between the two delivery methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a comprehensive safety evaluation of tiotropium.
- To compare safety data from placebo-controlled trials using both HandiHaler and Respimat inhalers.
- To provide an updated safety assessment of tiotropium in COPD patients.
Main Methods:
- Pooled analysis of adverse event (AE) data from randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials.
- Included trials involved tiotropium HandiHaler (18 μg) and Respimat (5 μg) in COPD patients.
- Incidence rates and rate ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
Main Results:
- Analysis included 11,626 placebo and 12,929 tiotropium patient-years across 35 trials.
- Tiotropium significantly reduced the risk of AEs (RR 0.90) and SAEs (RR 0.94) versus placebo.
- A numerically lower risk of fatal AEs (FAEs) (RR 0.90) and cardiac AEs (RR 0.93) was observed with tiotropium.
Conclusions:
- Tiotropium, delivered via HandiHaler or Respimat, is associated with lower rates of AEs and SAEs compared to placebo.
- The safety profiles were consistent when analyzed separately for each inhaler device.
- Rates of FAEs were similar between tiotropium and placebo groups.

