Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026
05:37
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
2.8K
Uncertainty Assessment in the Quantification of Risk Rates of Occupational Accidents.
Ioannis A Papazoglou1, Olga Aneziris1, Linda Bellamy2
1National Centre for Scientific Research "DEMOKRITOS," Terma Patriarchou Gregoriou E & Neapoleos, Agia Paraskevi, 153-10, Greece.
Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|February 27, 2015
Summary
This study quantifies occupational accident risks for 63 types in the Netherlands, analyzing over 9,000 incidents. It provides crucial data for understanding workplace hazards and informing safety measures.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health and Safety
- Risk Assessment
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Quantifying occupational accident risks is essential for effective workplace safety management.
- Previous studies may lack comprehensive data across diverse accident types and injury severities.
- Understanding the Dutch working population's exposure is key to accurate risk assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify occupational risk rates per hour of exposure for 63 accident types in the Netherlands.
- To assess the annual risks associated with these occupational accidents, considering exposure variability.
- To evaluate the suitability of different risk measures for occupational safety analysis.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of over 9,000 occupational accidents over six years in the Netherlands.
- Inclusion of reportable consequences: fatal, permanent, and serious recoverable injuries requiring hospitalization.
- Application of Bayesian uncertainty assessment to risk rate values.
Main Results:
- Quantified occupational risk rates per hour of exposure for 63 accident types.
- Calculated annual risks for each accident type, incorporating exposure variability.
- Performed Bayesian uncertainty assessment on risk rate values.
Conclusions:
- The study provides a robust dataset for occupational risk assessment in the Netherlands.
- Findings aid in understanding the frequency and severity of workplace accidents.
- The evaluation of risk measures informs best practices in occupational safety and health research.
Keywords:
Accidents per workerBayesian analysisoccupational accidentoccupational annual riskoccupational risk rateuncertainty assessmentMore Related Videos
13:04Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
12.5K
10:22Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
Published on: September 7, 2019
8.9K
Related Concept Videos
00:59Uncertainty: Overview
1.9K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.9K
00:59Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
2.2K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
2.2K
00:54Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
12.7K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
12.7K
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
579
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
579
01:08Determination of Expected Frequency
2.8K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.8K
03:37Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
113.9K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
113.9K