Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

579
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
579
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

580
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
580
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

725
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
725
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

1.1K
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
1.1K
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

495
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
495
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.7K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Causal inference and digital twins: a roadmap for the future of clinical trials.

NPJ digital medicine·2026
Same author

Using Off-Treatment Sequential Multiple Imputation for Binary Outcomes to Address Intercurrent Events Handled by a Treatment Policy Strategy.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same author

Estimation of Treatment Policy Estimands for Continuous Outcomes Using Off-Treatment Sequential Multiple Imputation.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2024
Same author

A UK framework for the assessment and integration of different scientific evidence streams in chemical risk assessment.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2024
Same author

Recognition of COVID-19 with occupational origin: a comparison between European countries.

Occupational and environmental medicine·2023
Same author

EraSOR: a software tool to eliminate inflation caused by sample overlap in polygenic score analyses.

GigaScience·2023
Same journal

Targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) in regulatory submissions and research: a landscape analysis.

The international journal of biostatistics·2026
Same journal

Predicting birth weight by multivariate functional principal component regressions.

The international journal of biostatistics·2026
Same journal

Robust median regression for count data with general lower truncation using a contaminated discrete Weibull model.

The international journal of biostatistics·2026
Same journal

Handling the uncertainty issue of missingness via a mixture-structure-based method.

The international journal of biostatistics·2026
Same journal

Statistical method for pooling categorical biomarker data from multi-center matched/nested case-control studies.

The international journal of biostatistics·2026
Same journal

Prognostic score methods for the estimation of the average causal effect.

The international journal of biostatistics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 16, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.8K

Robust bayesian sensitivity analysis for case-control studies with uncertain exposure misclassification

Timothy Shin Heng Mak, Nicky Best, Lesley Rushton

    The International Journal of Biostatistics
    |February 27, 2015
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces a robust Bayesian method to address exposure misclassification bias in case-control studies. It offers a more informative approach when misclassification probabilities are uncertain, improving bias adjustment and uncertainty quantification.

    More Related Videos

    Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
    07:15

    Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

    Published on: January 16, 2019

    11.5K
    Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
    05:53

    Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

    Published on: June 21, 2018

    10.9K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 16, 2026

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    2.8K
    Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
    07:15

    Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

    Published on: January 16, 2019

    11.5K
    Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
    05:53

    Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

    Published on: June 21, 2018

    10.9K

    Area of Science:

    • Epidemiology
    • Biostatistics
    • Statistical Modeling

    Background:

    • Exposure misclassification in case-control studies biases odds ratio estimates.
    • Current methods to adjust for misclassification require prior distributions for probabilities, which can be problematic with high uncertainty.
    • This uncertainty leads to overly wide posterior intervals and subjective prior dependence.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a robust Bayesian approach for handling exposure misclassification in case-control studies.
    • To provide an alternative to methods relying on elicited prior distributions for misclassification probabilities.
    • To enable more useful sensitivity analyses by considering ranges of values for unknown parameters.

    Main Methods:

    • A robust Bayesian framework is proposed, utilizing a feasible region for misclassification probabilities instead of prior distributions.
    • An inequality constrained optimization algorithm is employed to find the extrema of posterior inference within this region.
    • This approach avoids fixing all unknown parameters to specific values, allowing for consideration of parameter ranges.

    Main Results:

    • The proposed method offers a more informative approach when exposure misclassification is highly uncertain.
    • It facilitates sensitivity analyses by allowing exploration of a range of misclassification probabilities.
    • Posterior inference becomes less dependent on subjective prior elicitation.

    Conclusions:

    • The robust Bayesian approach provides a valuable alternative for adjusting bias and quantifying uncertainty in the presence of uncertain exposure misclassification.
    • This method enhances the utility of sensitivity analyses in epidemiological studies.
    • It addresses limitations of existing methods when dealing with high uncertainty in misclassification probabilities.