Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

5.3K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
5.3K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

15.9K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
15.9K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

9.1K
9.1K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

15.7K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
15.7K
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

15.0K
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
15.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

SCAPS simulation and design of highly efficient CuBi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub>-based thin-film solar cells (TFSCs) with hole and electron transport layers.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Demonstration of an Integrated terahertz band-stop filter using an apodized Bragg grating.

Optics express·2023
Same author

Characterization of a split-ring-resonator-loaded transmission line at terahertz frequencies.

Optics express·2021
Same author

Terahertz low-pass filter based on cascaded resonators formed by CPS bending on a thin membrane.

Optics express·2020
Same author

Unsupervised GEI-Based Gait Disorders Detection From Different Views.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2020
Same author

Efficient and Robust Skeleton-Based Quality Assessment and Abnormality Detection in Human Action Performance.

IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics·2019
Same journal

Real-time EEG-based epileptic seizure prediction using artificial intelligence: A systematic review.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2026
Same journal

R-peak detection and ECG data compression scheme based on empirical mode decomposition and wavelet transform.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2026
Same journal

CastNet: A three-channel EEG-based deep learning model for cross-subject depression detection.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2026
Same journal

State-of-the-art TinyML approaches for colorectal cancer detection: Current advances, challenges, and future directions.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2026
Same journal

JRadiEvo: A Japanese radiology report generation model enhanced by evolutionary optimization of model merging.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causally-informed deep learning towards explainable and generalizable outcome prediction in critical care.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

1.6K

Machine learning in computational docking.

Mohamed A Khamis1, Walid Gomaa2, Walaa F Ahmed1

  • 1Cyber-Physical Systems Lab, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST), P.O. Box 179, New Borg El-Arab City, 21934 Alexandria, Egypt.

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
|March 1, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning (ML) techniques significantly improve computational docking for drug design. ML-based scoring functions outperform traditional methods, enhancing the accuracy of predicting drug-target interactions and identifying promising drug candidates.

Keywords:
Complex binding affinityComputational dockingDrug discoveryForce field interactionLigands ranking accuracyMachine learningPharmacophore fingerprintRandom forestScoring functionSupport vector machineVirtual screening

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

4.0K
A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

215

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

1.6K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

4.0K
A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

215

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Drug discovery
  • Machine learning

Background:

  • Computational docking predicts drug-target interactions.
  • Scoring functions evaluate binding affinity and stability.
  • Traditional scoring functions have limitations in accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) techniques in computational docking.
  • To demonstrate the effectiveness of ML in designing accurate scoring functions for drug design.
  • To showcase the paradigm shift from traditional to ML-based approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized machine learning (ML) techniques for developing scoring functions.
  • Extracted molecular features from public databases like PDBbind.
  • Employed Random Forest (RF) models for scoring and ranking ligands.

Main Results:

  • ML-based scoring functions show superior performance compared to conventional methods.
  • An RF-based scoring function achieved a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.803, outperforming traditional methods (0.644).
  • RF models demonstrated high accuracy in ranking ligands (62.5%) and identifying top binders (78.1%).

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning represents a significant advancement in computational docking and drug design.
  • Future research directions include exploring diverse molecular features and advanced ML techniques like deep learning.
  • Combining multiple ML models holds potential for further improvements.