Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Peer review through perinatal statistics.

G Rooth1

  • 1Department of Paediatrics, University of Uppsala, Sweden.

International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
|September 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Oxygen Tension of the Blood in the Umbilical Cord and the Intervillous Space.

Archives of disease in childhood·2010
Same author

A Follow-up Study of Dysmature Infants.

Archives of disease in childhood·2010
Same author

Guidelines for blood sampling and measurement of pH and blood gas values in obstetrics. Based upon a workshop held in Zurich, Switzerland, March 19, 1993 by an Ad Hoc Committee.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·1994
Same author

Resuscitation of asphyxic newborn infants with room air or 100% oxygen.

Pediatric research·1993
Same author

The variability of cardiopulmonary adaptation to pregnancy at rest and during exercise.

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1992
Same author

Frontiers in perinatal medicine.

Early human development·1992

Perinatal statistics are a powerful tool for peer review, enhancing maternity care quality. Comparing national data and providing rapid feedback to delivery units motivates practitioners to improve care standards.

Area of Science:

  • Perinatal Medicine
  • Public Health
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Maternity care quality is crucial for maternal and infant outcomes.
  • Effective peer review mechanisms are essential for healthcare quality assurance.
  • International comparisons can highlight disparities in healthcare performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the utility of perinatal statistics as a tool for peer review.
  • To show how these statistics can improve the standard of maternity care.
  • To provide examples of successful implementation in different countries.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing national perinatal mortality data for international comparisons.
  • Implementing rapid feedback systems for perinatal statistics to delivery units.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzing the impact of comparative data on practitioner motivation and performance.

    • Main Results:

    • Perinatal statistics effectively served as an instrument for peer review.
    • Comparative data incentivized practitioners to improve maternity care standards.
    • Examples from Sweden, Scotland, and Germany illustrate successful application.

    Conclusions:

    • Perinatal statistics are a valuable and effective tool for enhancing maternity care quality through peer review.
    • Rapid feedback of detailed statistics is a key driver for improving practitioner performance.
    • International benchmarking using perinatal data can lead to significant advancements in maternal and infant healthcare.