Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

OP-IVM: Combining In vitro Maturation after Oocyte Retrieval with Gynecological Surgery
Published on: May 9, 2021
Prognostic factors for IVF success: diagnostic testing and evidence-based interventions
Athanasios Papathanasiou1, Siladitya Bhattacharya2
1Bourn-Hall Clinic, Wymondham, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Before in vitro fertilization (IVF), many tests and treatments are suggested. However, evidence shows few are truly justified, with cost and harm being key considerations.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Medicine
- Infertility Treatment
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Numerous pre-treatment investigations and interventions are commonly used to optimize outcomes for in vitro fertilization (IVF).
- Popular modalities include hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, ovarian reserve testing, sperm function analysis, and surgical or lifestyle interventions for conditions like endometriosis, fibroids, and endometrial polyps.
- Novel techniques such as endometrial injury are also frequently considered.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically appraise the evidence supporting common pre-IVF tests and interventions.
- To evaluate the scientific justification for various diagnostic and therapeutic procedures prior to IVF.
- To identify factors influencing the adoption of these pre-IVF modalities.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and critical appraisal of existing research evidence.
- Analysis of data on hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, ovarian reserve tests, sperm function tests, endometriosis surgery, fibroid surgery, endometrial polyp removal, and endometrial injury.
- Evaluation of the complexity, potential harm, and cost-effectiveness of each intervention.
Main Results:
- The evidence supporting many widely used pre-IVF tests and interventions is limited or insufficient.
- Only a small subset of the investigated modalities demonstrated clear justification based on current research.
- Factors such as procedural complexity, risk of adverse events, and cost-effectiveness significantly influence clinical decision-making.
Conclusions:
- The routine application of many pre-IVF diagnostic tests and interventions is not consistently supported by robust scientific evidence.
- Clinicians and patients should carefully consider the evidence base, potential risks, and economic implications before proceeding with pre-IVF treatments.
- Further research is needed to establish the true efficacy and cost-effectiveness of various pre-IVF optimization strategies.
More Related Videos
08:06Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Impact of Immediate Partial Removal of Cumulus-Oocyte Complexes on Fertilization Efficiency and Embryo Quality
Published on: October 18, 2024
08:46Fertility Preservation Through Oocyte Vitrification: Clinical and Laboratory Perspectives
Published on: September 16, 2021
Related Concept Videos
In Vitro Fertilization
The IVF process begins with ovarian stimulation, during which reproductive endocrinologists prescribe hormonal medications to stimulate the ovaries to produce multiple eggs instead of the single...
Infertility in Females
Endometriosis, a condition characterized by abnormal growth of...
Infertility in Males
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions