Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Monitoring Lung Function with Electrical Impedance Tomography in the Intensive Care Unit
Published on: September 6, 2024
Multifaceted bench comparative evaluation of latest intensive care unit ventilators
M Garnier1, C Quesnel2, J-P Fulgencio3
1Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, Hôpital Tenon Faculté de Médecine Pierre & Marie Curie marcgarnier@gmail.com.
Latest intensive care unit ventilators show varied performance. Basic functions like tidal volume delivery and pressurization can be unreliable, despite effective non-invasive ventilation algorithms during leaks.
Area of Science:
- Mechanical Ventilation
- Respiratory Care
- Medical Device Performance Evaluation
Background:
- Bench studies are crucial for assessing ventilator performance in simulated clinical conditions.
- Understanding ventilator accuracy is vital for patient safety and effective treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of modern intensive care unit (ICU) ventilators in delivering set parameters.
- To assess ventilator performance under various typical and challenging conditions, including leakage.
- To provide clinicians with a detailed performance report of current ICU ventilators.
Main Methods:
- Thirteen ICU ventilators were tested using the ASL5000 test lung.
- Evaluations included accuracy of tidal volume (VT) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in assist-control ventilation (ACV).
- Performance of trigger and pressurization in pressure support ventilation (PSV) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) algorithms were assessed with and without leakage.
Main Results:
- Significant heterogeneity in ventilator performance was observed.
- In ACV, accuracy for VT and PEEP varied, with several devices failing to compensate for leakage.
- In PSV, inspiratory delays and pressurization efficiency differed significantly between devices, both invasively and non-invasively.
Conclusions:
- There is considerable variation in the performance of the latest generation of ICU ventilators.
- While NIV algorithms effectively manage leaks, core functions like VT delivery in ACV and pressurization in PSV may be less accurate than indicated.
- Clinicians should be aware of potential discrepancies between displayed values and actual ventilator performance.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:

