Comparative Evaluation of Disc Diffusion and E-test with Broth Micro-dilution in Susceptibility testing of

Prashant Gupta1, Vineeta Khare2, Deepak Kumar3

  • 1Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, King George's Medical University , Lucknow, U.P, India .

Abstract

Insights

The disk diffusion method offers a simpler approach for Aspergillus antifungal susceptibility testing, showing good agreement with broth micro-dilution for voriconazole and caspofungin. However, caution is advised when interpreting amphotericin B results with this method.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Mycology
  • Clinical Microbiology
  • Antifungal Resistance

Background:

  • Increasing incidence of invasive Aspergillus infections due to immunosuppression.
  • Limited availability of routine antifungal susceptibility testing for Aspergillus.
  • Need for simpler, cost-effective susceptibility testing methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the disk diffusion (DD) method for Aspergillus antifungal susceptibility testing (AFS).
  • To compare DD and E-test against the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) broth micro-dilution (BMD) method.
  • To assess the susceptibility patterns of Aspergillus isolates to amphotericin B, voriconazole, and caspofungin.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated disk diffusion (DD) for amphotericin B (AMB), voriconazole (VCZ), and caspofungin (CAS).
  • Tested 44 clinical Aspergillus isolates (34 A. fumigatus, 8 A. flavus, 2 A. terreus).
  • Compared DD and E-test on Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA) with CLSI BMD.

Main Results:

  • Disk diffusion showed 87.5% agreement with BMD for AMB; E-test showed 93.8% agreement.
  • Both DD and E-test demonstrated high agreement (93.8% for VCZ, 100% for CAS) with BMD.
  • 31.8% and 9.1% of isolates exceeded epidemiological cut-off values (ECV) for AMB and VCZ, respectively; all were within ECV for CAS.

Conclusions:

  • The CLSI disk diffusion method is a potentially easier, reproducible, and cost-effective AFS method.
  • Interpretation of disk diffusion for amphotericin B requires caution.
  • E-test demonstrates better correlation with BMD compared to disk diffusion.

Related Concept Videos

Antimicrobial Effectiveness01:28

Antimicrobial Effectiveness

The effectiveness of antimicrobial agents depends on various factors influencing their ability to eliminate microbial populations. Larger microbial populations require more time for complete eradication, emphasizing the importance of population size analysis when evaluating antimicrobial efficacy.Microbial resistance to antimicrobial agents varies significantly. Highly resilient microorganisms include endospores, gram-negative bacteria, and non-enveloped viruses, while prions are exceptionally...
2.1K
Antifungal Agents01:15

Antifungal Agents

Amphotericin B is a broad-spectrum antifungal agent that exploits structural differences between fungal and mammalian cell membranes. Its amphipathic structure—featuring a hydrophobic polyene-lactone ring and a hydrophilic region containing mycosamine and carboxylic acid groups—enables selective binding to ergosterol, a sterol predominantly found in fungal plasma membranes. This selective interaction underlies the drug’s antifungal activity, although weak binding to...
100
Automated Microbial Diagnostics01:24

Automated Microbial Diagnostics

Automated diagnostic analyzers have transformed clinical microbiology by providing rapid and reliable methods for pathogen identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Among these systems, the Vitek 2 is widely used because it automates the traditionally labor-intensive processes of microbial identification (ID) and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST), delivering standardized and timely results that are essential for effective patient care.Microbial Identification with ID CardsThe...
54