Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.3K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.3K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.4K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.4K
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

874
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
874
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.9K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.9K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.8K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.8K
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

2.9K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
2.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Navigating open data sharing and privacy in the age of clinical AI research: from reidentification to pseudo-reidentification.

EClinicalMedicine·2026
Same author

Enhancing Soldiers for Future Warfare: Good Science; Bad Ethics?

Science and engineering ethics·2025
Same author

Horizon Scan of Emerging Issues at the Intersection of National Security, Artificial Intelligence, and Human Performance Enhancement.

Science and engineering ethics·2025
Same author

Rate of Errors During Routine Biological Manipulations.

Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association·2025
Same author

How do we justify research into enhanced warfighters?

Journal of law and the biosciences·2024
Same author

Gain-of-function research and model organisms in biology.

Journal of medical ethics·2023
Same journal

Autonomy under uncertainty: the structural limits of substituted judgment in clinical practice.

Monash bioethics review·2026
Same journal

Clinical ethical issues in paediatric practice: exploring the awareness and opinions of paediatricians in order to grow paediatric clinical ethics services in a Malaysian teaching hospital.

Monash bioethics review·2026
Same journal

Should Australia implement regulatory changes to include Normothermic Regional Perfusion in organ donation and change our definition of death?

Monash bioethics review·2026
Same journal

The challenge of forming solidarity in Germany as a culturally diverse society during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Monash bioethics review·2026
Same journal

Changing Discourse on In Vitro Gametogenesis: Expectation, Scientific Reality, and the Ethics of Hype.

Monash bioethics review·2026
Same journal

Public engagement and bioethics as natural allies.

Monash bioethics review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.2K

Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues.

Nicholas G Evans1

  • 1Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy in the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Market Street, Suite 320, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-3319, USA, evann@mail.med.upenn.edu.

Monash Bioethics Review
|March 7, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study expands the understanding of dual-use research by incorporating social factors beyond just the likelihood and magnitude of potential harms and benefits. It introduces relational and positional concerns into the assessment of dual-use potential.

More Related Videos

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

3.5K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.2K
RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

3.5K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Science and Technology Studies
  • Research Ethics
  • Sociology of Science

Background:

  • Dual-use research debates traditionally focus on the probability and impact of scientific advancements being misused.
  • Existing frameworks often overlook the societal context influencing the application of scientific research.
  • Understanding the societal implications is crucial for responsible innovation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To broaden the conceptualization of dual-use potential by integrating social dimensions.
  • To introduce relational and positional factors into the analysis of dual-use research outcomes.
  • To provide a more comprehensive framework for evaluating the societal impact of science and technology.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of existing dual-use research frameworks.
  • Development of a supplemented model incorporating social context.
  • Theoretical defense of the enhanced model against potential criticisms.

Main Results:

  • The conventional model of dual-use potential is insufficient due to its neglect of social factors.
  • A new account of dual-use potential is proposed, emphasizing relational and positional concerns.
  • This expanded view offers a more nuanced understanding of how research can be used for benefit or harm.

Conclusions:

  • Societal context is a critical determinant of dual-use research outcomes.
  • A holistic approach, including social aspects, is necessary for robust dual-use research governance.
  • Future discussions on research ethics must integrate these social considerations for responsible science.