Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
Published on: February 23, 2024
Artifacts in orthodontic bracket systems in cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography
V Hirschinger1, S Hanke, U Hirschfelder
1Department of Orthodontics and Orofacial Orthopedics, Zahnklinik 3 - Kieferorthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Glückstr. 11, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
This study quantified artifacts from orthodontic brackets in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) scans. Artifact intensity varied by bracket material and scanner type, with no definitive recommendation for either technology.
Area of Science:
- Dental Imaging
- Radiology
- Biomaterials
Background:
- Orthodontic treatment often requires dental imaging for diagnosis and monitoring.
- Computed tomography (CT) offers detailed cross-sectional views, with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) being common modalities.
- Artifacts in CT scans can degrade image quality, potentially affecting diagnostic accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify and compare imaging artifacts produced by different orthodontic bracket systems.
- To evaluate artifact generation across both cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) technologies.
Main Methods:
- Four orthodontic bracket systems were attached to a human cadaver mandible.
- Scans were performed using one MSCT and three CBCT units, alongside a reference scan.
- Artifacts were quantified by analyzing image quality reductions (standard deviation percentages) in registered datasets.
Main Results:
- Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) generally produced higher artifact percentages than cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) units.
- Specific CBCT units occasionally showed higher artifacts than the MSCT system.
- Titanium brackets exhibited significant differences in artifact intensity between MSCT and CBCT, with higher artifacts on MSCT.
Conclusions:
- Artifact intensity varies based on bracket material composition and the specific CT scanner technology (MSCT or CBCT).
- While artifact manifestation differs, their impact on image quality was comparable across systems.
- The study does not support a universal recommendation for or against MSCT or CBCT due to variable artifact severity.
More Related Videos
10:23Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: September 8, 2023
09:10Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
Published on: August 5, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography