Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

9.1K
9.1K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

15.9K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
15.9K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

20.3K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
20.3K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

4.4K
4.4K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

6.0K
Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence...
6.0K
Molecular Models02:00

Molecular Models

45.8K
Physical models representing molecular architectures of chemical compounds play essential roles in understanding chemistry. The use of molecular models makes it easier to visualize the structures and shapes of atoms and molecules.
45.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Single-nucleus RNA-seq dissection of choroid plexus tumor cell heterogeneity.

The EMBO journal·2024
Same author

Carboxylic ester hydrolases: Classification and database derived from their primary, secondary, and tertiary structures.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2016
Same author

Carbohydrate-binding module tribes.

Biopolymers·2014
Same author

Fatty acid synthesis enzyme clans.

Biotechnology letters·2014
Same author

Molecular mechanism of a hotdog-fold acyl-CoA thioesterase.

Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2014
Same author

CHMP1A encodes an essential regulator of BMI1-INK4A in cerebellar development.

Nature genetics·2012
Same journal

Tracking Synthetic Adhesins on Bacterial Surfaces with Immunofluorescence Microscopy.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Post-Selection Methods for Analyzing mRNA Display Selections and Optimization of Hits.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

High-Performance Computing in Tandem Mass Spectrometry (MS/MS) Peptide Identification.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Engineering and Adapting Disulfide-Containing Proteins to Enable Intracellular Functionality.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

AI-Driven Protein Research: From Prediction to Design.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Methods for the In Vitro Selection of Protein and Peptide Libraries Using mRNA Display.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

1.6K

Scoring functions for AutoDock.

Anthony D Hill1, Peter J Reilly

  • 1St. Jude Medical, One St. Jude Medical Dr., Saint Paul, MN, 55117-9983, USA, thill@sjm.com.

Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.)
|March 11, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Developing custom scoring functions for AutoDock is crucial for accurate protein-ligand binding energy prediction. This involves careful consideration of data and methods for specific force fields and molecular types.

More Related Videos

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

1.4K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

4.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

1.6K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

1.4K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

4.0K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Molecular modeling
  • Drug discovery

Background:

  • Automated docking is vital for screening protein-ligand interactions.
  • Scoring functions, combining force fields and weights, estimate binding energy.
  • Custom scoring functions may be needed for novel force fields or molecules.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the essential data and methods for developing custom scoring functions.
  • To guide users in adapting AutoDock for specific molecular systems.

Main Methods:

  • Describes considerations for data selection in scoring function development.
  • Details methodological approaches for training custom scoring functions.
  • Focuses on integration with the AutoDock software.

Main Results:

  • Provides a framework for building tailored scoring functions.
  • Highlights the importance of empirical data and validation.
  • Enables more accurate binding energy predictions for diverse molecules.

Conclusions:

  • Custom scoring functions enhance the accuracy of automated docking.
  • Careful data and method selection are key to successful function development.
  • This approach improves the utility of AutoDock in computational drug design.