META: an MRI-based scoring system differentiating metastatic from osteoporotic vertebral fractures
So Kato1, Takahiro Hozumi2, Kiyofumi Yamakawa2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sensory and Motor System Medicine, Surgical Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8677, Japan.
Background Context:
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful for the differential diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) and metastatic vertebral fractures (MVFs), but no single finding is absolutely conclusive.
Purpose:
The purpose of the present study was to create a scoring system to facilitate the correct diagnosis of MVFs by integrating several MRI findings.
Study Design:
This is a retrospective and single-center observational study that attempts to create a diagnostic scoring system by discriminant analysis.
Patients Sample:
We included 100 OVFs and 100 MVFs in thoracolumbar vertebrae of which MR images were obtained within 60 days from the suspected time of fractures.
Outcome Measures:
The sensitivity and specificity of known important MRI findings were assessed, and the classification accuracy of the scoring system was investigated.
Methods:
Seven MRI findings of these fractures were analyzed to evaluate their sensitivity and specificity. Using these findings as variables, discriminant analysis was performed in 140 fractures as a training set, and the classification accuracy was calculated in the remaining 60 fractures as a test set. Additionally, the images of these 60 fractures were reviewed by another blinded reviewer to investigate the interobserver reliability of each finding.
Results:
All findings had high specificity with low-to-moderate sensitivity. Eight variables were selected in the final discriminant function. A simpler scoring system (MRI Evaluation Totalizing Assessment [META]) was created by approximating the coefficients and the constant term by integral numbers. The classification accuracy was calculated to be 96.6% in the test set. The interobserver reliability of the key findings varied, but the final discrimination conducted by META had the high agreement between the two reviewers (κ=0.93).
Conclusions:
This novel scoring system, META, could prove to be a useful tool for the differential diagnosis of OVFs and MVFs. It is simple and physician friendly, yet highly accurate.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...


