Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

04:35
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
3.8K
Quantifying Adventitious Error in a Covariance Structure as a Random Effect
1Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467 , USA, hao.wu.5@bc.edu.
Psychometrika
|March 28, 2015
Summary
This study introduces a novel method to quantify errors in covariance structures by modeling adventitious error. This approach provides a measure of model misspecification related to approximation errors.
Area of Science:
- Statistics
- Quantitative Psychology
- Econometrics
Background:
- Covariance structures are fundamental in statistical modeling.
- Model misspecification can lead to inaccurate inferences.
- Quantifying these errors is crucial for reliable analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a method for quantifying errors in covariance structures.
- To introduce adventitious error as a random effect to measure model misspecification.
- To establish the analytical properties and numerical implementation of this approach.
Main Methods:
- Explicitly modeling adventitious error as a random effect with a distribution.
- Estimating the dispersion parameter of this distribution as a measure of misspecification.
- Developing an algorithm for numerical implementation and establishing consistency and asymptotic distributions.
Main Results:
- The measure of misspecification is related to the root mean square error of approximation.
- Consistency and asymptotic sampling distributions were established under a novel asymptotic paradigm.
- Simulations validated the theoretical findings and highlighted the importance of accounting for adventitious error.
Conclusions:
- The proposed method effectively quantifies errors in covariance structures.
- The estimated dispersion parameter serves as a robust measure of model misspecification.
- This approach enhances the reliability of statistical inferences in complex models.
Related Concept Videos
Random Error
10.1K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
10.1K
Random and Systematic Errors
16.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
16.2K
Random and Systematic Errors
964
964
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
113.9K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
113.9K
Variation
8.4K
An important characteristic of any set of data is the variation in the data. In some data sets, the data values are concentrated closely near the mean; in other data sets, the data values are more widely spread out from the mean. The most common measure of variation, or spread, is the standard deviation, which is the square root of variance.
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
8.4K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
11.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.5K

