Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random Error01:04

Random Error

10.1K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
10.1K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

16.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
16.2K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

964
964
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

113.9K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
113.9K
Variation01:19

Variation

8.4K
An important characteristic of any set of data is the variation in the data. In some data sets, the data values are concentrated closely near the mean; in other data sets, the data values are more widely spread out from the mean. The most common measure of variation, or spread, is the standard deviation, which is the square root of variance.
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
8.4K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does insulin bolster antioxidant defenses via the extracellular signal-regulated kinases-protein kinase B-nuclear factor erythroid 2 p45-related factor 2 pathway?

Antioxidants & redox signaling·2011
Same author

Decrease in calcium-sensing receptor in the progress of diabetic cardiomyopathy.

Diabetes research and clinical practice·2011
Same author

JAMIE: A software tool for jointly analyzing multiple ChIP-chip experiments.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2011
Same author

Morphine-induced conditioned place preference in mice: metabolomic profiling of brain tissue to find "molecular switch" of drug abuse by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.

Analytica chimica acta·2011
Same author

[The interventions effect-assessment of the workers exposed to N, N-dimethylformamide by percutaneous in a synthetic leather factory].

Zhonghua lao dong wei sheng zhi ye bing za zhi = Zhonghua laodong weisheng zhiyebing zazhi = Chinese journal of industrial hygiene and occupational diseases·2011
Same author

[The analysis of effect of Th1/Th2 cytokine in the different prognosis in severe influenza A (H1N1)].

Zhonghua shi yan he lin chuang bing du xue za zhi = Zhonghua shiyan he linchuang bingduxue zazhi = Chinese journal of experimental and clinical virology·2011
Same journal

Testing linear hypotheses in repeated measures generalized linear models using external information.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

When Do Unifactorial Items Increase the Reliability?

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal Designs for Diagnostic Models: Identification and Estimation.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Modeling Rare Events and Nonmonotone Nonignorable Missingness of Time-Varying Outcomes and Predictors in Binary Time-Series Daily Diary Data: A Bayesian Selection Model.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Revelle's Beta: The Wait Is Over-Computation Becomes Possible.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

On dimensional implication graphs.

Psychometrika·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K

Quantifying Adventitious Error in a Covariance Structure as a Random Effect.

Hao Wu1, Michael W Browne

  • 1Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467 , USA, hao.wu.5@bc.edu.

Psychometrika
|March 28, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel method to quantify errors in covariance structures by modeling adventitious error. This approach provides a measure of model misspecification related to approximation errors.

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.5K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.5K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Quantitative Psychology
  • Econometrics

Background:

  • Covariance structures are fundamental in statistical modeling.
  • Model misspecification can lead to inaccurate inferences.
  • Quantifying these errors is crucial for reliable analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a method for quantifying errors in covariance structures.
  • To introduce adventitious error as a random effect to measure model misspecification.
  • To establish the analytical properties and numerical implementation of this approach.

Main Methods:

  • Explicitly modeling adventitious error as a random effect with a distribution.
  • Estimating the dispersion parameter of this distribution as a measure of misspecification.
  • Developing an algorithm for numerical implementation and establishing consistency and asymptotic distributions.

Main Results:

  • The measure of misspecification is related to the root mean square error of approximation.
  • Consistency and asymptotic sampling distributions were established under a novel asymptotic paradigm.
  • Simulations validated the theoretical findings and highlighted the importance of accounting for adventitious error.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed method effectively quantifies errors in covariance structures.
  • The estimated dispersion parameter serves as a robust measure of model misspecification.
  • This approach enhances the reliability of statistical inferences in complex models.