Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Conventional Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression: A Step-by-Step Protocol
Published on: November 21, 2025
Depression Subtypes in Predicting Antidepressant Response: A Report From the iSPOT-D Trial
Bruce A Arnow1, Christine Blasey1, Leanne M Williams1
1From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Pacific Graduate School of Psychology-Stanford Consortium, Palo Alto, Calif.; the Brain Dynamics Center, Sydney Medical School-Westmead and Westmead Millennium Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Brain Resource, Ltd., Sydney; Brain Resource, Inc., San Francisco; the Sierra-Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto; the Department of Psychiatry, Monash University and Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia; the Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh; and Duke-National University of Singapore Graduate Medical School, Singapore.
Depression subtypes showed significant overlap, with no difference in treatment response or remission rates among groups. Antidepressant selection based on these subtypes may offer minimal clinical value.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Clinical Psychology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is heterogeneous.
- Identifying specific depressive subtypes may aid treatment selection.
- Previous research has explored various depressive subtypes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of melancholic, atypical, and anxious depressive subtypes and their combinations in outpatients with MDD.
- To compare the remission rates and symptom changes in these subtypes after treatment with escitalopram, sertraline, or venlafaxine.
Main Methods:
- 1,008 adult outpatients with MDD were randomized to 8 weeks of escitalopram, sertraline, or venlafaxine.
- Participants were categorized into eight mutually exclusive groups based on subtype criteria (pure, multiple, or no subtype).
- Symptom trajectories were analyzed using mixed-effects models, and remission was assessed via logistic regression.
Main Results:
- 39% of participants had a pure subtype, 36% had multiple subtypes, and 25% had no subtype.
- All subtype groups showed similar significant reductions in depressive symptoms.
- No significant differences in remission rates were observed between subtype groups, and subtype did not moderate treatment effects.
Conclusions:
- Substantial overlap exists among melancholic, atypical, and anxious depressive subtypes.
- All identified subtype groups responded similarly to the three tested antidepressants.
- These findings suggest that depressive subtypes may have limited utility in guiding antidepressant selection.
Related Concept Videos
Antidepressant Drugs: MAOIs and Other Agents
Depressive Disorders: MDD and Dysthymia
Antidepressant Drugs: Overview
G-protein Coupled Receptors
The Placebo Effect
Depressive Disorders: Etiology
Biological Factors in Depression
Biological predispositions significantly influence the risk of developing depressive disorders. Genetic studies highlight the role of variations in the serotonin transporter...

