Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026
Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis
Published on: March 23, 2019
Accuracies in Measuring Spinopelvic Parameters in Full-Spine Lateral Standing Radiograph
Katsutaka Yamada1, Yoichi Aota, Takayuki Higashi
1From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Study Design:
Prospective comparative study of measuring pelvic incidence (PI) among standing radiographs of whole spine and pelvis and computed tomographic (CT) scans in a cohort of patients.
Objective:
To analyze accuracies in measuring PI and other spinopelvic parameters.
Summary Of Background Data:
Previous reports indicated relatively low agreement in measuring PI even among experienced spinal surgeons; intra- and inter-rater reliability in manually measuring PI were 0.69 (0.62-0.74) and 0.41 (0.36-0.45), respectively; the mean interclass correlation coefficient value of manually measuring PI was 0.881. No study compared PI on standing radiographs with that measured on CT scans.
Methods:
A total of 120 consecutive patients with spinal disease (38 patients had history of hip arthroplasty) who admitted to our hospital from April 2012 for 6 months were enrolled. Subjects had obtained full-spine lateral standing radiograph, standing radiograph of pelvis, and CT scans. Pelvic incidence on full-spine lateral standing radiograph and that on pelvis lateral standing radiograph were measured manually by 2 experienced spinal surgeons. Intra- and interobserver reliability of the measurements were analyzed by using interclass correlation coefficient. On CT scans, PI was measured using 3-dimensional CT scan software (CT-PI). PI among 3 different imaging modalities was evaluated using correlation coefficients.
Results:
In whole-spine radiographs, the intra- and interobserver agreement rates with measurements in PI (0.84 and 0.79, respectively) and sacral slope (0.87 and 0.83, respectively) were lower than those in pelvic tilt (0.98 and 0.96, respectively) and PI-lumbar lordosis (0.97 and 0.97, respectively). The correlation coefficient between P-PI and CT-PI was higher (0.95) than that between FS-PI and CT-PI (0.81) and between FS-PI and P-PI (0.85).
Conclusion:
The reliability of measuring PI is comparatively lower than that of other spinopelvic parameters, and the variability of PI measurement is mainly due to difficulty of precisely identifying sacral endplate.
Level Of Evidence:
2.
Related Concept Videos
01:11Anatomical Positions
The body is upright, facing forward, and standing erect.
The feet are parallel and flat on the floor.
The arms are hanging by the...
01:16Vertebral Column: Regions and Curvature
Regions of the Vertebral Column
In an adult, the spine is subdivided into five regions: the cervical, the thoracic, the lumbar, the sacral, and the coccygeal region. The spine initially develops as a series of 33 vertebrae; after 20 years of age, the nine bones in the sacral region, five sacral, and four coccygeal bones fuse to form...