Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

725
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
725
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

8.9K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).
8.9K
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test01:09

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

7.1K
In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
7.1K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

14.4K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.4K
Goodness-of-Fit Test01:16

Goodness-of-Fit Test

9.5K
The goodness-of-fit test is a type of hypothesis test which determines whether the data "fits" a particular distribution. For example, one may suspect that some anonymous data may fit a binomial distribution. A chi-square test (meaning the distribution for the hypothesis test is chi-square) can be used to determine if there is a fit. The null and alternative hypotheses may be written in sentences or stated as equations or inequalities. The test statistic for a goodness-of-fit test is given as...
9.5K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.6K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing Trauma-Related Symptoms Among Military Personnel Using the MMPI-3.

Journal of personality assessment·2025
Same author

Assessing the Relationship Among Childhood Maltreatment, Personality Dysfunction, and Externalizing Behavior.

Journal of personality disorders·2025
Same author

American black bear (Ursus americanus) as a potential host for Campylobacter jejuni.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Markers of Suicide Risk on the MMPI-3 Among Post-9/11 Veterans.

Journal of personality assessment·2025
Same author

<i>Campylobacter molothri</i> sp. nov. isolated from wild birds.

International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology·2025
Same author

Do MMPI-3 Validity Scale Findings Generalize to Concurrently Administered Measures? Validation with a Forensic Disability Sample.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 15, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.5K

A Bayesian approach to mixed group validation of performance validity tests.

Douglas Mossman1, William G Miller1, Elliot R Lee1

  • 1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine.

Psychological Assessment
|March 31, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a Bayesian approach to mixed group validation (MGV) for accurately assessing malingering detection tools. This method overcomes limitations of previous techniques, offering reliable accuracy estimates for clinical and psycholegal assessments.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.8K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 15, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.5K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.8K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Psychological assessment
  • Forensic psychology
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Accurate detection of malingering is crucial in clinical and legal settings.
  • Current methods for validating malingering assessment tools, like mixed group validation (MGV), have limitations.
  • Traditional MGV can produce biased, vague, or logically impossible accuracy estimates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel Bayesian approach to mixed group validation (MGV).
  • To address and overcome the limitations of typical MGV implementations.
  • To provide a more robust method for estimating the accuracy of malingering detection tools.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a Bayesian framework for mixed group validation (MGV).
  • Applied the Bayesian MGV approach to existing data from the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM).
  • Analyzed accuracy estimates, considering covariates like study population and litigation status.

Main Results:

  • The Bayesian MGV approach provides clear and logically sound accuracy estimates for malingering measures.
  • Findings on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) align with previous research but are derived without problematic assumptions.
  • Accuracy estimates are influenced by factors such as study population and litigation context.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed Bayesian approach to MGV offers a superior method for evaluating the accuracy of malingering assessment tools.
  • This method avoids reliance on potentially flawed assumptions about examinee intentions or simulator realism.
  • The conceptual framework is applicable to a wide range of assessment tools in clinical and psycholegal contexts.