Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
Published on: November 14, 2025
Certain performance values arising from mammographic test set readings correlate well with clinical audit
BaoLin Pauline Soh1, Warwick Bruce Lee2, Claudia Mello-Thoms3
1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Mammographic test set performance correlates with clinical audit data in breast cancer screening. These findings suggest test sets can predict radiologist performance but caution is needed when generalizing specificity.
Area of Science:
- Radiology and Medical Imaging
- Biostatistics
- Public Health
Background:
- Breast screening programs increasingly use test sets to supplement clinical audits.
- The precise relationship between mammographic test set performance and clinical audit outcomes has remained unclear.
- This study aimed to clarify the association between mammographic test set performance and clinical audit data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the correlation between mammographic test set performance metrics and clinical audit data for radiologists.
- To determine if test set performance can serve as a reliable indicator of clinical performance in breast cancer screening.
Main Methods:
- Twenty radiologists' clinical audit data over two years was analyzed.
- A test set of 60 mammographic examinations (40 normal, 20 cancer cases) was used.
- Performance metrics including Jackknifing free-response operating characteristic (JAFROC) figure-of-merit (FOM), location sensitivity, and specificity were calculated and compared to audit data using Spearman's rho.
Main Results:
- JAFROC FOM significantly correlated with recall rate, detection of small invasive cancers, missed cancers, and overall sensitivity.
- Location sensitivity showed significant correlations with the detection rates of small invasive cancers, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and overall cancer detection.
- Several strong correlations were observed between test set performance indicators and key clinical audit metrics.
Conclusions:
- Performance indicators derived from mammographic test sets show significant correlations with specific aspects of clinical performance in breast cancer screening.
- While test sets offer valuable insights, caution is advised when generalizing test set specificity to real-world clinical scenarios.
- The study supports the utility of test sets in evaluating radiologist performance but highlights the need for careful interpretation.
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT

