Cardiac resynchronization therapy: past, present, and future
Neal A Chatterjee1, Jagmeet P Singh2
1Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves outcomes for heart failure patients with electrical dyssynchrony. However, some patients do not respond, necessitating strategies to optimize CRT effectiveness and address future challenges.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), also known as biventricular pacing, is a standard treatment for symptomatic heart failure (HF).
- CRT is indicated for patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) function and significant electrical dyssynchrony.
- Despite its benefits, a notable portion of patients do not respond to CRT, highlighting a need for further research and optimization strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the electrical and physiological basis of biventricular pacing.
- To summarize key clinical trials evaluating CRT efficacy.
- To discuss methods for enhancing patient response to CRT and outline future challenges.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of landmark clinical trials and physiological studies.
- Analysis of strategies for optimizing CRT response.
- Discussion of future directions in CRT delivery and patient care.
Main Results:
- CRT has demonstrated significant improvements in morbidity and mortality in selected HF populations.
- Understanding the electrical and physiological rationale is crucial for effective CRT implementation.
- Various strategies exist to optimize CRT response, though nonresponse remains a clinical challenge.
Conclusions:
- CRT is an established therapy for specific heart failure patients, improving clinical outcomes.
- Optimizing CRT response requires a multifaceted approach, addressing patient selection, device programming, and lead placement.
- Future research should focus on improving CRT delivery, patient selection, and long-term management to maximize benefits and minimize nonresponse.
Abstract:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), or biventricular pacing, has become a standard therapeutic modality for patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF), depressed left ventricular (LV) function, and electrical dyssynchrony. Despite the overall success of CRT in improving morbidity and mortality in selected patients with HF, a significant minority demonstrates nonresponse. This review describes the electrical and physiologic rationale for biventricular pacing therapy, summarizes landmark clinical trials assessing CRT efficacy, highlights strategies to optimize the response to CRT, and frames future challenges in the use, delivery, and care of patients undergoing CRT.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiac Action Potential
The cardiac action potential process involves a series of phases characterized by the movement of ions across the cardiac cell membranes, leading to the depolarization and repolarization of the cardiac myocytes.
Ionic Basis of Cardiac Action Potentials
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure I: Introduction


