Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
Published on: July 27, 2018
Beacon communities' public health initiatives: a case study analysis
Barbara L Massoudi1, Laura H Marcial1, Saira Haque1
1RTI International.
The Beacon Communities for Public Health project identified key facilitators and barriers in technology implementation. Promising practices include strong partnerships, good task-technology fit, and effective evaluation frameworks for better population health outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Information Technology
- Sociotechnical Systems
Background:
- The Beacon Communities for Public Health (BCPH) project aimed to understand public health activities in Beacon Communities.
- The Beacon Community Program focused on technology-enabled initiatives to improve health outcomes through health IT infrastructure and exchange.
- Key areas included measurable improvements in cost, quality, and population health, alongside innovative approaches to performance measurement and care delivery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To gain a comprehensive understanding of the range of population and public health activities within the Beacon Communities.
- To identify successes and challenges in implementing technology-enabled public health initiatives.
- To share findings broadly within the public health community to inform future efforts.
Main Methods:
- Conducted four multimethod case studies using a modified sociotechnical framework.
- Employed document review and semistructured key informant interviews for data collection.
- Selected public health initiatives based on NACCHO Model Practice Program criteria.
Main Results:
- Common barriers and facilitators were identified across all sociotechnical framework components (structure, people, technology, tasks, overarching considerations, sustainability).
- Facilitators (7-14 per Beacon) significantly outnumbered barriers (4-6 per Beacon).
- Common weaknesses included a lack of a standardized evaluation framework.
Conclusions:
- Identified four promising practices: strong partnerships, task-technology fit, technology acceptance, and education/value demonstration.
- Emphasized the importance of a shared evaluation framework for effective implementation and future improvements.
- Highlighted the need for supporting evaluation to inform subsequent public health initiatives.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...