Objective pain assessment after ureteral reimplantation: comparison of open versus robotic approach

M Harel1, K W Herbst2, R Silvis2

  • 1University of Connecticut Health Center, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA; Connecticut Children's Medical Center, 282 Washington Street, Hartford, CT, 06106, USA.

Insights

Robotic ureteral reimplantation in children showed lower narcotic use and less severe pain compared to open surgery. Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to confirm these findings.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Open ureteral reimplantation is standard for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR).
  • Minimally invasive techniques may reduce pain and recovery time.
  • Previous studies on pain comparison between open and minimally invasive surgery are inconclusive.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare postoperative pain in children undergoing open versus robotic ureteral reimplantation.
  • Utilized age-appropriate, validated pain assessment scales for accurate measurement.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective cohort study of VUR surgery patients (July 2010-February 2013).
  • Excluded patients receiving endoscopic treatment or caudal/epidural anesthesia.
  • Assessed pain scores and narcotic doses on postoperative day 1.

Main Results:

  • Robotic surgery (23 patients) showed lower narcotic requirements than open surgery (11 patients) (P < 0.05).
  • No statistically significant difference in subjective pain scores (P = 0.12).
  • Significantly higher percentage of robotic patients experienced mild/no pain (57%) vs. open (27%), and lower severe pain (9% vs. 45%).

Conclusions:

  • Robotic ureteral reimplantation associated with reduced narcotic needs and lower perceived pain intensity.
  • Validated pain scores and narcotic requirements offer a more accurate pain assessment than indirect measures.
  • Larger sample sizes are required to strengthen statistical significance and subgroup analyses.
Abstract