Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

486
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
486
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

17.1K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
17.1K
Unrealistic Optimism Bias01:30

Unrealistic Optimism Bias

347
Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...
347
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.9K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.9K
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

335
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
335
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.3K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A framework for the recursive risk-ranking of foodborne zoonotic threats along food supply chains.

One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same author

Evaluating compliance with UN Security Council Resolution 1540 on nonproliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2025
Same author

A framework for supporting health capability-based planning: Identifying and structuring health capabilities.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2022
Same author

Deterrence against Terrorist Attacks in Sports-Mega Events: A Method to Identify the Optimal Portfolio of Defensive Countermeasures.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2021
Same author

A Risk Analysis Framework for Prioritizing and Managing Biosecurity Threats.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2020
Same author

Assessing the Benefits and Costs of Homeland Security Research: A Risk-Informed Methodology with Applications for the U.S. Coast Guard.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2019
Same journal

The Roles of Place Attachment and Geovisualizations on Hurricane Storm Surge Risk Perceptions and Behavioral Intentions.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Scientists' Experiences With Getting Help Making Strategic Communication Choices.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Evolutionarily Optimal Risk Aversion".

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Toward Resilient Cross-Regional Emergency Governance: A Demand-Driven and Propagation-Based Evolutionary Cooperation Framework.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Competition and Collaboration in the AI Race: Country-LevelDirectional Evidence for Risk Monitoring and Policy.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Cyber Resilience: Management With Cybersecurity Controls.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K

Cognitive and Motivational Biases in Decision and Risk Analysis.

Gilberto Montibeller1, Detlof von Winterfeldt2

  • 1School of Business and Economics, Loughborough University, LE11 3TU, Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK.

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|April 16, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Decision and risk analysis aims to reduce cognitive biases, but analysts face these same biases when gathering expert input. This study identifies relevant biases and debiasing techniques for better analysis outcomes.

Keywords:
Cognitive biasesdecision analysisdecision modelingmotivational biasesrisk analysis

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.6K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.6K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.5K

Area of Science:

  • Decision Analysis
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Risk Management

Background:

  • Behavioral decision research shows human judgments are prone to biases.
  • Decision and risk analysis methods are designed to mitigate these biases.
  • Analysts often encounter decision-maker biases during input elicitation, compromising analysis quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Identify cognitive and motivational biases affecting decision and risk analysis inputs.
  • Review and guide the application of debiasing techniques.
  • Distinguish between biases that hinder and those correctable by logic.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of cognitive and motivational biases.
  • Analysis of bias relevance in decision and risk analysis contexts.
  • Evaluation of existing debiasing strategies.

Main Results:

  • Identified key cognitive and motivational biases that distort analysis inputs and resist correction.
  • Provided guidance on applying debiasing techniques.
  • Categorized biases based on their susceptibility to logical correction or task decomposition.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding and addressing cognitive and motivational biases is crucial for accurate decision and risk analysis.
  • Effective debiasing strategies can improve the quality of analysis inputs.
  • Further research is needed to refine debiasing methods and address remaining challenges.