Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
Mentorship in nursing academia: a systematic review protocol
Lorelli Nowell1, Deborah E White2, Kelly Mrklas3
1Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada. lnowell@ucalgary.ca.
This systematic review protocol outlines the first global evidence appraisal for mentorship in nursing academia. It aims to identify evidence gaps and guide effective mentorship interventions for nursing faculty and students.
Area of Science:
- Nursing Education Research
- Academic Mentorship
- Faculty Development
Background:
- Mentorship is crucial for attracting, training, and retaining nursing faculty.
- Evidence for mentorship's value in academic medicine exists, but not yet established in nursing academia.
- A protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review is described to assess existing evidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically appraise the global evidence for mentorship in nursing academia.
- To identify evidence gaps and inform the development of mentorship interventions.
- To guide mentorship practices for improved outcomes for nursing faculty, students, and patients.
Main Methods:
- Mixed-methods systematic review protocol.
- Inclusion of studies on mentorship interventions for registered nursing faculty.
- Exploration of mentee, mentor, and institutional outcomes.
- Comprehensive search of electronic databases and gray literature.
- Independent review and data extraction by two reviewers.
- Potential for meta-synthesis (qualitative) and meta-analysis (quantitative).
Main Results:
- This section will be populated upon completion of the systematic review.
Conclusions:
- This study represents the first systematic review of global evidence on mentorship in nursing academia.
- Findings will identify evidence gaps and inform the development and implementation of mentorship interventions.
- Outcomes will guide mentorship practices to enhance positive results for nursing faculty, students, and patient care.
- The review will highlight future research directions in nursing academia mentorship and nursing science.
Related Concept Videos
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
Theoretical Foundations of Nursing Practice
Theories provide a perspective to assess patients' conditions and organize data and methods. They also assist in analyzing and interpreting information. They represent a...
National Nursing Organizations II
The AACN emphasizes a healthy work environment through six standards to achieve an optimal patient outcome. The standards are appropriate staffing, meaningful recognition, collaboration, authentic leadership, effective communication, and decision-making. In addition, AACN provides certification programs, webinars, journals, and...
Nursing Evaluation
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.