Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

3.6K
Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
3.6K
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

486
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
486
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

14.1K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
14.1K
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

2.9K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
2.9K
Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

2.4K
Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
2.4K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pressured or Voluntary? Motivations for Vaccination during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Future Health-Protective Behaviors.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same author

From Stories to Action: How Framing, Perspective, and Identifiability in Personal Narratives Influence Vaccination Decisions.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same author

Bias is not color blind: Ignoring gender and race leads to suboptimal selection decisions-A registered report.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

Guilt drives prosociality across 20 countries.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Partial ignorance: Strategies for coping with inconvenient information.

Current opinion in psychology·2025
Same author

Willful inattention: Integrating visual attention mechanisms and willful ignorance.

Current opinion in psychology·2025
Same journal

Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children's Learning?

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Eye Glint as a Novel Perceptual Cue in Human Vision.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Multitarget Visual Search Flexibly Switches Between Concurrent and Sequential Search Modes.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Motive Alignment Promotes Adolescents' Proenvironmental Behavior: A Field Experiment in Two Cultures.

Psychological science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.2K

Justifications shape ethical blind spots.

Andrea Pittarello1, Margarita Leib1, Tom Gordon-Hecker1

  • 1Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.

Psychological Science
|April 17, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Ambiguity creates ethical blind spots by shifting attention to tempting information, leading to self-serving dishonesty. This study reveals how unclear situations amplify unethical behavior through biased attention.

Keywords:
ambiguityattention allocationdishonestyethical decision makingeye movementsmoralityopen dataopen materialspreregisteredself-deception

More Related Videos

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.7K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.2K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.7K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Unethical behavior often stems from limited attention to ethical considerations, creating an ethical blind spot.
  • Ambiguity plays a significant role in exacerbating these ethical blind spots and leading to ethical failures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of ambiguity on the formation of ethical blind spots.
  • To determine how attention to tempting information in ambiguous settings affects the magnitude of dishonesty.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a novel ambiguous-dice paradigm to simulate ambiguous decision-making scenarios.
  • Participants reported die roll outcomes for monetary gain, with tempting or non-tempting values varied for secondary dice.
  • Eye-tracking technology monitored participants' visual attention during the task.

Main Results:

  • In ambiguous settings, participants' incorrect responses were consistently self-serving.
  • Increased attention toward tempting information directly correlated with the extent of participants' ethical blind spots.
  • Eye-movement data confirmed that attention allocation is shaped by the presence of tempting cues in ambiguous environments.

Conclusions:

  • Ambiguity directs attention towards self-serving, tempting information, thereby widening ethical blind spots.
  • Understanding the role of attention in ambiguous situations is crucial for mitigating unethical behavior.
  • Interventions aimed at ethical decision-making should consider attentional biases in ambiguous contexts.