Is urinary density an adequate predictor of urinary osmolality?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Ultrasonography of the Adult Male Urinary Tract for Urinary Functional Testing
Published on: August 14, 2019
Ana Carolina P Souza1, Roberto Zatz2, Rodrigo B de Oliveira3,4
1Nephrology Service, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. anacarolinapessoa@gmail.com.
Background:
Urinary density (UD) has been routinely used for decades as a surrogate marker for urine osmolality (Uosm). We asked if UD can accurately estimate Uosm both in healthy subjects and in different clinical scenarios of kidney disease.
Methods:
UD was assessed by refractometry. Uosm was measured by freezing point depression in spot urines obtained from healthy volunteers (N = 97) and in 319 inpatients with acute kidney injury (N = 95), primary glomerulophaties (N = 118) or chronic kidney disease (N = 106).
Results:
UD and Uosm correlated in all groups (p < 0.05). However, a wide range of Uosm values was associated with each UD value. When UD was ≤ 1.010, 28.4% of samples had Uosm above 350 mOsm/kg. Conversely, in 61.6% of samples with UD above 1.020, Uosm was below 600 mOsm/kg. As expected, Uosm exhibited a strong relationship with serum creatinine (Screat), whereas a much weaker correlation was found between UD and Screat.
Conclusion:
We found that UD is not a substitute for Uosm. Although UD was significantly correlated with Uosm, the wide dispersion makes it impossible to use UD as a dependable clinical estimate of Uosm. Evaluation of the renal concentrating ability should be based on direct determination of Uosm.
Related Concept Videos
Formation of Concentrated Urine
Formation of Dilute Urine
Filtrate Osmolarity in the PCT
Initially, as the filtrate passes through the proximal convoluted tubule (PCT), its...
Urine Studies I: Urinalysis
Physiology of the Genitourinary System III: Urine Concentration and Dilution
Regulation of Water Intake
Serum Studies: Renal Function Tests

