Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhancing experimental design through Bayes factor design analysis: insights from multi-armed bandit tasks.

Wellcome open research·2026
Same author

Hitting the Sulcus With a More Tangential Angle May Result in Resistance Felt During Implantation of Stereotactic Electroencephalography Electrodes.

Neurosurgery practice·2026
Same author

The Effect of Thermal Pain on Working Memory: Behavioral Evidence from the n-Back Task.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Theta burst stimulation for depressive symptoms in early-stage dementia with Lewy bodies: Protocol for a single-arm open-label feasibility study (DL-TBS Study).

PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences·2026
Same author

Effective radiofrequency thalamotomy for posttraumatic Holmes tremor: illustrative case.

Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons·2026
Same author

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Lateral Cerebellum Enhances Prediction During Manual Tracking of a Moving Visual Target.

Cerebellum (London, England)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Breathing-controlled Electrical Stimulation BreEStim for Management of Neuropathic Pain and Spasticity
11:34

Breathing-controlled Electrical Stimulation BreEStim for Management of Neuropathic Pain and Spasticity

Published on: January 10, 2013

23.8K

Modulating the pain network--neurostimulation for central poststroke pain.

Koichi Hosomi1, Ben Seymour2, Youichi Saitoh1

  • 1Department of Neuromodulation and Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565 0871, Japan.

Nature Reviews. Neurology
|April 22, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Central poststroke pain (CPSP), a difficult complication affecting up to 10% of stroke survivors, may stem from brain network changes. Current treatments are often inadequate, highlighting the need for novel therapies.

More Related Videos

Subcutaneous Trigeminal Nerve Field Stimulation for Refractory Facial Pain
09:35

Subcutaneous Trigeminal Nerve Field Stimulation for Refractory Facial Pain

Published on: May 10, 2017

19.9K
Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain
03:26

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain

Published on: March 8, 2024

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Breathing-controlled Electrical Stimulation BreEStim for Management of Neuropathic Pain and Spasticity
11:34

Breathing-controlled Electrical Stimulation BreEStim for Management of Neuropathic Pain and Spasticity

Published on: January 10, 2013

23.8K
Subcutaneous Trigeminal Nerve Field Stimulation for Refractory Facial Pain
09:35

Subcutaneous Trigeminal Nerve Field Stimulation for Refractory Facial Pain

Published on: May 10, 2017

19.9K
Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain
03:26

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain

Published on: March 8, 2024

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Pain Management

Background:

  • Central poststroke pain (CPSP) affects up to 10% of stroke patients.
  • CPSP is challenging to treat and often linked to thalamic lesions.
  • Current treatments, primarily pharmacological, show limited efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize CPSP as a brain network reorganization disorder.
  • To review nonpharmacological treatments for CPSP.
  • To explore future therapeutic avenues for CPSP.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on CPSP.
  • Analysis of neurostimulation techniques (motor cortex stimulation, deep brain stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation).
  • Discussion of brain network reorganization in CPSP.

Main Results:

  • Electrical motor cortex stimulation shows promise but is invasive.
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation is effective but requires repeated sessions.
  • CPSP is best understood as a disorder of brain network reorganization.

Conclusions:

  • Current pharmacological treatments for CPSP are often inadequate.
  • Noninvasive neuromodulation techniques offer potential but have limitations.
  • Future research into neurophysiological mechanisms and technological innovation is crucial for developing effective CPSP treatments.