Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 14, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
Published on: November 26, 2015
Analysis of the Nature of IRB Contingencies Required for Informed Consent Document Approval
R Alexander Blackwood1, Ronald F Maio, Adam J Mrdjenovich
1a University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor , Michigan , USA.
Abstract:
The University of Michigan Human Research Protection Program formed a six-member committee to analyze the nature of Institutional Review Board (IRB) staff and board contingencies for the approval of informed consent documents. Of the 100 studies examined, 87% had one or more informed consent contingencies. "Omissions" in documentation (40%) and "better clarity" (24%) accounted for the majority, while "word-smithing" accounted for only 10%. This is one of the first studies to examine the nature of IRB contingencies as they relate to informed consent documents. Educational efforts targeting completeness in documentation and clarity on the part of study teams, and discouraging "word-smithing" on the part of IRBs, could reduce the number of informed consent contingencies and expedite the IRB approval process.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I
The legal responsibilities of a nurse regarding informed consent include the following:
Ethical Dilemmas II
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers

