Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 14, 2026

State of the Art Cranial Ultrasound Imaging in Neonates
Published on: February 2, 2015
Posterior fossa abnormalities in high-risk term infants: comparison of ultrasound and MRI
S J Steggerda1, F T de Bruïne, V E H J Smits-Wintjens
1Department of Neonatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands, s.j.steggerda@lumc.nl.
Insights
Posterior fossa abnormalities are common in high-risk newborns. Adding mastoid fontanelle views to cranial ultrasound (CUS) significantly improves detection of these abnormalities, aiding early diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Neurology
- Pediatric Radiology
- Neuroimaging
Background:
- Posterior fossa (PF) abnormalities present diagnostic challenges in high-risk term neonates.
- Cranial ultrasound (CUS) is a primary imaging modality, but its efficacy for PF assessment can be limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the characteristics of PF abnormalities in high-risk term neonates.
- To determine the diagnostic performance of CUS, with and without mastoid fontanelle (MF) views, for detecting PF abnormalities compared to MRI.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 113 term neonates who underwent both CUS and MRI.
- Calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for routine CUS and CUS with MF views.
Main Results:
- PF abnormalities were identified in 46/113 infants by CUS, with MRI confirming 43 and revealing additional findings in 32.
- Routine CUS had low sensitivity (16%) for major PF abnormalities, while adding MF views increased sensitivity to 82%.
- MF views detected 57% of all PF abnormalities (major/minor) with 95% specificity; however, acute hypoxic-ischemic injury and small hemorrhages were often missed by CUS.
Conclusions:
- PF abnormalities are frequent in high-risk term infants.
- Incorporating MF views into CUS enhances the detection of clinically significant PF abnormalities.
- MRI remains superior for identifying hypoxic-ischemic injury and small posterior fossa hemorrhages.
Objectives:
We aimed to assess the characteristics of posterior fossa (PF) abnormalities in a cohort of high-risk term neonates, as well as the diagnostic performance of cranial ultrasound (CUS) with additional mastoid fontanelle (MF) views for the detection of these abnormalities, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) being the reference standard.
Methods:
In this retrospective study, 113 term neonates with CUS and subsequent MRI were included. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of routine CUS and CUS with MF views were calculated.
Results:
Posterior fossa abnormalities were diagnosed on CUS in 46 of 113 infants. MRI confirmed these findings in 43 and showed additional abnormalities in 32 infants. The sensitivity and specificity of anterior fontanelle views for major PF abnormalities as seen on MRI were 16% and 99%. Adding MF views increased the sensitivity of US to 82%. The sensitivity and specificity of MF views for the detection of any (major or minor) PF abnormality were 57% and 95%. Especially acute hypoxic-ischemic injury and small subdural and punctate cerebellar haemorrhage remained undetected by CUS.
Conclusions:
PF abnormalities are frequent in high-risk term infants. MF-CUS enables early diagnosis of major PF abnormalities. We therefore advocate to perform MF-CUS in high-risk term neonates.
Key Points:
• Posterior fossa abnormalities are a frequent finding in high-risk term infants. • Adding mastoid fontanelle views improves ultrasound detection of clinically relevant abnormalities. • Hypoxic-ischemic injury and small posterior fossa haemorrhages are better detected with MRI. • Cranial ultrasound examination should include mastoid fontanelle views in high-risk term neonates.
More Related Videos
08:03Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025
06:56Human Fetal Blood Flow Quantification with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Motion Compensation
Published on: January 7, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography