Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein Organization01:24

Protein Organization

10.2K
Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence....
10.2K
Protein Organization01:13

Protein Organization

162.3K
Overview
162.3K
Protein Organization01:13

Protein Organization

25.1K
25.1K
Protein Organization01:24

Protein Organization

10.1K
10.1K
Protein and Protein Structure02:15

Protein and Protein Structure

93.1K
Proteins are one of the most abundant organic molecules in living systems and have the most diverse range of functions of all macromolecules. Proteins may be structural, regulatory, contractile, or protective. They may serve in transport, storage, or membranes; or they may be toxins or enzymes. Their structures, like their functions, vary greatly. They are all, however, amino acid polymers arranged in a linear sequence.
A protein's shape is critical to its function. For example, an enzyme...
93.1K
Protein Folding01:22

Protein Folding

131.2K
Overview
131.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantifying domain-specific relevance of computational biology Wikipedia articles using TF-IDF and cosine similarity.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Reaping the Fruits of LLM Pruning: Towards Small Language Models for Efficient Non-Coding Variant Effect Prediction.

Genes·2025
Same author

CATHe2: Enhanced CATH superfamily detection using ProstT5 and structural alphabets.

Biology methods & protocols·2025
Same author

From CASP13 to the Nobel Prize: DeepMind's AlphaFold Journey in Revolutionizing Protein Structure Prediction and Beyond.

Current protein & peptide science·2025
Same author

Language Modelling Techniques for Analysing the Impact of Human Genetic Variation.

Bioinformatics and biology insights·2025
Same author

Air Pollution Monitoring Using Cost-Effective Devices Enhanced by Machine Learning.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 13, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

70.1K

Customised fragments libraries for protein structure prediction based on structural class annotations.

Jad Abbass1, Jean-Christophe Nebel2

  • 1Faculty of Science, Engineering and Computing, Kingston University, London, KT1 2EE, UK. k1064285@kingston.ac.uk.

BMC Bioinformatics
|May 1, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Integrating structural constraints into fragment selection improves protein structure prediction accuracy. This method enhances performance for various protein classes, offering a more efficient and reliable approach for in silico modeling.

More Related Videos

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

1.4K
Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons
08:04

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons

Published on: June 6, 2025

1.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 13, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

70.1K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

1.4K
Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons
08:04

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons

Published on: June 6, 2025

1.8K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Structural bioinformatics

Background:

  • In silico protein structure prediction is crucial due to experimental limitations.
  • Fragment-based methods struggle with longer proteins, speed, and energy functions.
  • Structural class prediction software offers reliable performance for integrating constraints.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address limitations in fragment-based protein structure prediction.
  • To improve accuracy and efficiency by integrating structural constraints into fragment selection.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Rosetta, a fragment-based protein structure prediction package.
  • Integrated structural class annotations (CATH, SCOP) into the fragment selection process.
  • Evaluated the pipeline on 70 CASP targets up to 150 amino acids.

Main Results:

  • Significantly improved structure prediction performance (GDT_TS +2.6, RMSD -0.4).
  • Both CATH and SCOP classifications yielded similar performance enhancements.
  • Class-based fragments led to more relevant conformations and quicker convergence (up to 10% GDT_TS improvement).

Conclusions:

  • The proposed methodology yields models up to 7% higher in quality than standard methods.
  • Integration of structural constraints is a promising approach for fragment-based prediction.
  • Ab initio prediction remains challenging for larger proteins; further improvements may involve enhanced search strategies and energy functions.