[Impotence due to venous incompetence. Research on reliable diagnostic criteria]

"Venous incompetence" is thought to be an organic cause of impotence. Its diagnosis is usually based upon Artificial Erection Test (AET); now, the reliability of this procedure is contested. We tested it in 9 controls, 13 psychogenic impotent patients and 65 impotent patients presenting "venous incompetence" according AET (maintenance flow rate needed for erection--MFR greater than 75 ml/min). Organicity of impotence was evaluated by Nocturnal Penile Tumescence monitoring and by the results of a sex-therapy. AET reproducibility was tested in 24 cases. The interest to perform an intracavernous injection of 80 mg papaverine before AET was tested in 18 impotent patients. Our results confirm that MFR is the most reliable criterion for interpreting AET. But 15% of the impotent patients with a MFR greater than 120 ml/min, 32% of those with a MFR greater than or equal to 80 ml/min and 66% of those with a MFR between 80 and 120 ml/min were in fact psychogenic patients. Moreover, we found "excessive" MFR in 3 of the 13 psychogenic patients and one of the normal controls (160 ml/min). In 50% of our patients, AET results were not reproducible. Injecting papaverine before AET significantly reduces MFR, but false positive results do still exist. Some recent physiopathologic data suggest that AET performed after papaverine injection might logically be disturbed by stress. These data should incite to be cautious when interpreting AET results, and results of "venous incompetence" surgery.